Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

versus


SH, Part 1 The High Court refuses to interfere with the transfer order approved by the Settlement Authorities in the writ jurisdiction

1968 S C M R 1357

Present : Fazle‑Akbar, C. J. and Sajjad Ahmad, J

HAKIM ZULQARNAIN AND ANOTHER ---Petitioners

versus

Mst. ASGHARI BEGUM AND OTHERS‑-Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 83 of .1968, decided on 20th June 1968.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the. High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore, dated the 21st November 1967, in Writ Petition No. 405/R of 1957).

Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958),

Sch , Part 1‑High Court in writ jurisdiction declining to interfere with order of transfer passed by Settlement authorities‑.High Court's order found unexceptionable‑Special Leave to Appeal refused by Supreme Court.

Zaki‑ud‑Din Pal, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Rana 1hlaqbool Ahmad Qadri, Attorney for Petitioners.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 20th June 1968.

JUDGMENT

SAJJAD AHMAD, J.

‑This petition arises out of a judgment and order of a Division Bench of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore dismissing the petitioner's Writ Petition for their claim to House No. 9/18 (No. S‑IV‑20‑S‑18), Beadon Road, Lahore, which has been transferred by the Settlement authorities in favour of respondent Kist. Asghari Begum. It appears from the order of the High Court, that during the arguments in the High Court, the learned counsel for the petitioners conceded that petitioner No. 1 (Hakim Zulqarnain) had no case as he had already been transferred a house consisting of one room. The case of the second petitioner (Mst. Safia Begum) alone was pressed which did not find favour with the High Court on the ground that the house was rightly transferred to respondent No. 1 by the Settlement Authorities as she was the only claimant in possession of the house who had filed her C. H. Form. It was noted that no claim form had been filed by the second petitioner (Mst. Safia Begum) and that her husband Hakirn Abdul Majid Saifi, who was a local had agreed to the transfer of the house in dispute in favour of the respondent.

The High Court in its writ jurisdiction has rightly declined to interfere with the findings of fact reached by the Settlement Authorities.

We dismiss this petition which is without any substance.

Leave refused.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firm from Mailsi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.