Supreme Court — Judgments of 1968
338 reported judgments of the Supreme Court from 1968 — page 2 of 4.
- GHULAM HAIDER v. SHEEDA 1968 PCRLJ 437
Pakistan Penal Code Section 301 Appeal by the Sanitary High Court to reduce the death sentence from death sentence to transportation, which is the view of the High Court that the responsibility of the…
- MST. HAFIZAN v. WALI MUHAILMAD 1968 PCRLJ 443
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 Deferred to the Supreme Court that the Applicant Has Attacks on Angina Pectoris and is not behaving properly in a jail statement without supporting any medi…
- GHULAM ALIAS GOMI v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 447
The Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) 497 and 498 passed the bail, considering that the accused accused of no clear action in committing the crime showed the High Court at its discretion to violate any …
- GHULAM ALI v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 447
Pakistan Penal Code Section 325/34 seriously injured…
- PURSHOTTAMDAS THAKURDAS v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY CITY I 1968 PTD 478
Estimated tax prepayment of residential profits, whether to be included or not, is deducted at the same percentage of the dividend tax advance tax on which the tax is levied, regardless of income tax …
- REHMATULLAH v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 527
Under Section 145, the Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) maintains that under Section 145, the case was dealt with by the High Court, which granted special leave to the Special Court for appeal from the …
- THE STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN v. ABDUS SATTAR 1968 PCRLJ 611
Special leave appealed by the Supreme Court to examine its legal status in light of evidence in a case under section 23 of 23 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 1947…
- RUSTOM ALI KHAN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 614
Pakistan Penal Code Section 8080 & 88 convicts refused to acquit Opt by Sessions Judge and High Court convicted of crime The approach was wrong.…
- THE STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN v. ABDUS SATTAR 1968 PCRLJ 618
The appeal of the Supreme Court for special leave for appeal cannot be grounded at the hearing of Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 58 (3).…
- AMINUDDIN CHOWDHURY v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 622
Appeal (criminal) On the charge of serious crime, the High Court dismissed the appeal without dismissing any evidence from the High Court and ignoring the grounds on which it was dismissed. But the tr…
- MUHAMMAD JAHANGIR v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 625
Pakistan Penal Code Section 448 was found guilty by the High Court and it was allowed to appeal to the 6v Supreme Court for special appeal under the section whether it was justified to be acquitted or…
- PHANI BHUSAN MAJUMDAR v. MAJIBULLAH 1968 PCRLJ 628
Municipal Administration Ordinance 1960 reads with section 116 criminal code of conduct (V9 1898), sections 1 (2), 234 and 32, without a license, ordinance and magistrate under municipality boundary m…
- SHER ALI v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 733
Section 302/34 A&B firing on an empty range when a man entered a house to kidnap a girl and killed a man, while B was only firing two shots in an air dispute. Indicated different with the intention of…
- RAHIM KHAN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 764
Determining the crime or innocence of a criminal code of conduct (CCPC) section 561 depends on the full facts and circumstances of the case, in such cases, on request to stop the proceedings, rightful…
- ALLAHDITTO v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 765
Criminal Procedure for Transfer of Criminal Code (CCPC) Section 526…
- GIANCHAND v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 766
Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Section 203 Magistrate dismissing the accused for failing to provide written or oral evidence to support the allegations No basis for interfering with the dismissal orde…
- ISSO v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 773
Whether section 6 (5) of the Pakistan Criminal Law (Amendment) Act 1958 was once approved by the government for approval by the government, it can be revised whether the member of the government appro…
- THE STATE v. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL 1968 PCRLJ 851
The Pakistan Criminal Law (Amendment) Act 1958 section 6 (s) denies the sanction of the competent authority and instead the accused accepts the resignation of the Special Judge accused of refusing to …
- DR. ABDUL FATEH v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 863
Whether the West Pakistan Control of Gondas Ordinance 1959, section 18 and 13, under the approval of an appeal under section 18 under section 18, the divisional commissioner has the power to suspend t…
- COMMISSIONER; KHAIRPUR DIVISION v. ALI SHER SARKI 1968 PCRLJ 866
Pakistan Penal Code Section 9 The9 Thijay Prima's crime can be completed if the property was taken by someone else without further permission. She submits some documents to the civil court. Later on o…
- OBHAYO v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 867
A decree has been issued under section 497 of section 497 and section 497 of 498 of 498. None of the extraordinary circumstances mentioned in section 497 is a question as to whether the correct princi…
- SHABIR AHMAD KHAN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 881
Under Special Leave of Appeal under Sections 302 and 300, exception 4 Section 302, the Supreme Court appealed where there was a real cause of dispute between the parties; The question came down to whe…
- THE STATE v. SYED PIRAL SHAH 1968 PCRLJ 889
The affidavit denied practically all the evidence with the High Court, but ordered the magistrate to finish the criminal proceedings within 3 weeks.…
- MEHR DIN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 890
Under the Pakistan Penal Code Section 406 Partnership, the criminal proceedings under the partnership proceeded under section 561. He himself is guilty of a breach of trust that there is no such restr…
- SHAH NAWAZ v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1000
The Pakistan Penal Code read under Section 411/414 shall not be more than half the maximum punishment provided for a convicted felony. 511L11 Legal…
- ZAINUL ABDIN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1012
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Sections 522 Sections 147 and 447, Use of force under Section 522 for restoration of immovable property charges and supply of immovable property under PPC…
- MUSA v. MESSRS HUSSAINBHOY KARIMJI & SONS 1968 PCRLJ 1032
Pakistan Penal Code Section 411 was alleged to have rejected the appeal for special leave of appeal against the conviction, admitting the recovery of stolen goods from the hut, by the Supreme Court.…
- MOOSO v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1033
The Quetta and Kalat Civil and Criminal Law Ordinance 1965 Ordinance, 1965, Section 3 (4) held that subsection (4) applied equally to an issue on which the ordinance was enforced before a court. Was p…
- MLR MUHAMMAD TAHIR KHAN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1050
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 409 and 120B High Court denies special leave of appeal by Supreme Court in upholding conviction for non-exemption from accepted rules regarding the definition of evidence.…
- AMIR DIN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1113
Section 302/34 Section 302/34 The High Court's single eyewitness has accused the culprit of the culprits of several accused and the Supreme Court has allowed special leave to examine the evidence from…
- ABDUL HAKIM v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1166
Pakistan Penal Code Section 393 punishment for attempted robbery…
- HABIBULLAH v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1200
Sections 491 and 439 of the Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) have caught the heads of 40 A-40 cattle on suspicion that they were stealing and detaining A, claiming that six animals belong to him. And t…
- ABDUL MAJID v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1201
Punishment under Section High Court On appeal of reduction of sentence from death to transportation, the High Court has been sentenced by the complainant for appeal for special leave. 1962) The Compla…
- 1968 SCMR 1202 1968 SCMR 1202
Article 98 Other matters relating to other good practices which have already been examined and declared by the higher authority, to appeal to such a superior authority would be futile.…
- 1968 SCMR 1205 1968 SCMR 1205
The Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Act (XLVII of 1958) and the Reconstruction Settlement Scheme, Part II Rehabilitation Officers treat non-altites as sitting alities, who are legally subject to a…
- 1968 SCMR 1207 1968 SCMR 1207
Read with the Homeless Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (VI8 XX of XXVIII), SH, Part II Settlement Scheme No. 1, paragraph 21. The shop and its possession (though a local one) may legally…
- 1968 SCMR 1210 1968 SCMR 1210
Constitution of Pakistan (1962) Article 58 (3) Proof of Criminal Case Prosecution Prosecution's Testimony, on which the Applicant Was Sentenced, Appeals Under Special Leave of the High Court (XLV of 1…
- 1968 SCMR 1211 1968 SCMR 1211
Writ Jurisdiction for Settlement Decisions to Settle the Disposal of Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XX8II of 1958), Sch, Part I House, Distribution or any other way, Article …
- 1968 SCMR 1213 1968 SCMR 1213
Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), revocation of section 497 bail petition for special leave appeal against the High Court order…
- 1968 SCMR 1215 1968 SCMR 1215
Article 20 (2) and Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 98 Whether the Chief Settlement Commissioner demanded a record and whether a particular officer was appointed as the Chief Settlement Commis…
- SHAHADAT v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1218
Pakistan Penal Code Section 447 read with the Code of Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), Section 190 (1) (c) of the Interim Arbitration Courts Ordinance (XLIV of 1961). Section 18 of Section 18 of the Ordi…
- 1968 SCMR 1218 1968 SCMR 1218
O XLI, r 6 Preventing Implementation of Order by Appellate Court, by Supreme Court…
- 1968 SCMR 1220 1968 SCMR 1220
No objection to the necessary party, no matter under the provisions of O 1, r 9, CPC for dealing with any matter under or before the Supreme Court hearing, in fact the rights of the parties before it.…
- 1968 SCMR 1225 1968 SCMR 1225
A. XLI, rr 11 (2), 17 (I) and 19 appeals are dismissed for illegal proceedings. Request for reinstatement under O XLI, r 19 The date of the hearing of the petition for the reinstatement of the appeal,…
- 1968 SCMR 1228 1968 SCMR 1228
In the jurisdiction of SH, Part I and Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 98 Wright exchanged the House High Court to consider the question of whether he was able to find his own place on the que…
- 1968 SCMR 1229 1968 SCMR 1229
O XXII, r 4 Lack of appeal at the time of death in a village…
- 1968 SCMR 1230 1968 SCMR 1230
The Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (VI88 of XXVIII), SH, Part I Property was found to be irrevocable and not transferred to its allotted brother of transfer, unless the Order …
- 1968 SCMR 1231 1968 SCMR 1231
The Homelessness (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958), a home-and-property schedule property that is being re-purposed to be a part of, is settled by the High Court in the jurisdicti…
- 1968 SCMR 1232 1968 SCMR 1232
The second appeal pending section 15 (4) was the High Court's approval of the ad interim stay and thereafter the appellant was refusing to pay the rent to his landlord, thereby appealing the special l…
- 1968 SCMR 1233 1968 SCMR 1233
The land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act (Constitution of 1894), Sections 6, 7 and 18 Sections 6 and 7 has been paid by the civil judge on appeal under section 18, which the court has found ex…
- 1968 SCMR 1235 1968 SCMR 1235
Article 98 Laches Order After more than a year confiscated in writ jurisdiction, discretion in denial of plea bargain, special hearing for hearing, appeal denied special court leave…
- ALLAH BAKHSH v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1235
In the Constitution of Pakistan 1962, Article 58 (3) of the section 302 does not offer any basis for the sanction of special leave for the Penal Code (XI V of 1860), section 302 relating to the mere d…
- 1968 SCMR 1236 1968 SCMR 1236
Option to provide care under Section 488 and West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964), Sections 5, 20 and SH under Section 488; Special jurisdiction of the Family Court under the PC Act (XXXV of…
- 1968 SCMR 1238 1968 SCMR 1238
Article 58 (3) and Rules of the Supreme Court, 1956, Twelfth; r I explain at the time of the ban on the application (24 days); This applicant inadvertently requested a copy of the unwritten order when…
- 1968 SCMR 1239 1968 SCMR 1239
Constitution of Pakistan (1912), Article 58 (3) is a question of appreciation of evidence in a criminal case; special leave application is dismissed…
- 1968 SCMR 1240 1968 SCMR 1240
(B) the criminal code of conduct (v. 1898), section 512 and the Evidence Act (I of 1872), section 33 fugitive accused, the arrest of the prosecution witness by conducting an admissible magistrate at t…
- AHMAD v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1251
Section 302/149 Sentencing All defendants are responsible for, however, legally, liable for the crime against a number of accused gamers, ambassadors, and all victims of the general death. ? Two out o…
- 1968 SCMR 1253 1968 SCMR 1253
O XXXIX, r 2 The summary procedure under the Ordinance Mill while issuing an order from the Government for receiving more than Rs 6 lakh from the Mill Filing Directory Suite under the West Pakistan Go…
- 1968 SCMR 1256 1968 SCMR 1256
Section 1 561A, Part of Criminal Procedure Section 1 56 1A Although each case may not be lightly decided but can be decided on its own particular facts and circumstances, the High Court is satisfied t…
- 1968 SCMR 1261 1968 SCMR 1261
The appeal of the Section 307 petition has been accepted by the Supreme Court for a regular hearing on the argument that it was assured that the sentence was based on inadequate and biased evidence fo…
- 1968 SCMR 1264 1968 SCMR 1264
The following section 409 court did not appeal the special leave of intervention, accepting the complainant's evidence as credible, which the Supreme Court denied.…
- 1968 SCMR 1266 1968 SCMR 1266
Section 302 and Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), section 497, charged only with inciting murder, bail was granted by order of the High Court, no interference was demanded, no interference was sough…
- 1968 SCMR 1267 1968 SCMR 1267
The first meeting to be called for the election of chairman 3, 6 and 7, which was postponed because of the identity of a member, was the same day the meeting was attended by only one candidate and his…
- 1968 SCMR 1268 1968 SCMR 1268
The SH, Part I contest has been moved to A to negotiate between the A, B and C houses and while B is pursuing litigation up to the Supreme Court C, his brother does not make any complaint in the law. …
- 1968 SCMR 1269 1968 SCMR 1269
Article 58 (3) and the rules of the Supreme Court, 1956, O XIII, r 1 and O XXIV, r 1 apply for special leave for a special leave appeal for 63 days. Delayed dispute, held, unreasonable leave denied…
- 1968 SCMR 1270 1968 SCMR 1270
S, Part II Settlement Authorities find that the person had not occupied the shop before 20 12 58 The fact is that the High Court rightly refused to interfere with the writ jurisdiction.…
- 1968 SCMR 1271 1968 SCMR 1271
The strength of the SH, Part I House High Court, was held, which justified the decision not to interfere with the decision-making authorities.…
- 1968 SCMR 1272 1968 SCMR 1272
Section 302 aced criminal code code (V9 1898), section 464 accused was found guilty under section 302, PPC but the trial court, relying on medical evidence, said that the accused was mindless at the t…
- 1968 SCMR 1274 1968 SCMR 1274
Section 307 alleges that a person's waist with a knife was tampered with by a knife, which, for cautious reasons, was denied by the courts to protect himself.…
- 1968 SCMR 1274 1968 SCMR 1274
SH, Part II Shop Auction Aroused by the order of the Settlement Authority who participated in the auction and then after a lengthy delay in the jurisdiction of the High Court writ, and also other reme…
- 1968 SCMR 1276 1968 SCMR 1276
Section 316 deliberately pushed the knife into someone else's eye and thus deprived him of his sight and the Supreme Court denied the special leave to appeal for serious injury by permanently shaping …
- 1968 SCMR 1279 1968 SCMR 1279
O XL High Court Supreme Court Recipient Appointments do not usually interfere with savings in exceptional circumstances…
- 1968 SCMR 1280 1968 SCMR 1280
Sch, Part II The question is whether the shops are part of a factory; in fact the High Court rightly refused to interfere with the settlement authorities' order in the writ jurisdiction.…
- 1968 SCMR 1281 1968 SCMR 1281
Article 58 (3 bail request for special leave of appeal against a bail order denied) The defendant's convictions became punishable when he became incompetent…
- 1968 SCMR 1281 1968 SCMR 1281
Articles (58 ()) of special importance to the interpretation of the provisions of the Constitution were given special leave for appeal.…
- 1968 SCMR 1282 1968 SCMR 1282
Civil Appeal for Special Leave of Appeal on Default Points on the Points Included in the (58) Leave Supreme Court Leave Decision…
- GUL SHER v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1282
The Supreme Court rejected the unconstitutional special leave to appeal the Supreme Court while upholding the trial court, complying with Section 253 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC).…
- 1968 SCMR 1283 1968 SCMR 1283
A. XXI, r 10 and section 151 application of injunction preventing the applicant from issuing the order when default is not permitted to exclude the execution case in the presence of the holder; For ma…
- 1968 SCMR 1283 1968 SCMR 1283
On appeal of the grant of a bail hearing in the Supreme Court against the conviction under Section 307, the appeal denied on the basis that the High Court had imposed a heavy sentence.…
- 1968 SCMR 1285 1968 SCMR 1285
Article (58 ()) and Supreme Court Fines, X 1956, and X XII, r 1 criminal Appeal for special leave appeal in criminal case bar That applicant, an old man lived in a remote place so his The date will be…
- 1968 SCMR 1286 1968 SCMR 1286
Of course, Part I person rehabilitation authorities cannot claim a transfer of property on the basis of such unauthorized occupancy by violating property allotted to anyone before December 20, 1958. T…
- SAYHA MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1287
The accused S 302 and 201 were convicted under Section 302 and sentenced to death.…
- 1968 SCMR 1287 1968 SCMR 1287
Article 3 (3) The civil suit material evidence witness was not challenged in the cross examination and the lower court still failed to consider its evidence. Special leave to appeal to the special cou…
- 1968 SCMR 1290 1968 SCMR 1290
Section 302 Questions related to the High Court's appeal of the accused on appeal by the High Court: Did the High Court neglect the principles guiding the Appellate Court to deal with the Court of App…
- 1968 SCMR 1292 1968 SCMR 1292
The allotment of land obtained on the basis of fake documents specifically canceled the special leave of appeal which the Supreme Court denied.…
- 1968 SCMR 1293 1968 SCMR 1293
Sections 11 (4) and 7 (1) were read with the resettlement scheme, Part I paragraph 23 Chuck.…
- 1968 SCMR 1297 1968 SCMR 1297
In the case of the Pakistan Constitution (1962), Article 58 (3), a criminal appeal for special leave has been granted through leave of the Supreme Court to consider only the nature of the offense and …
- BARKAT v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1298
Criminal Procedure Code (CR PC) S; 497 (5) Canceled by the High Court, the Supreme Court refused to appeal the special leave using arbitrary property.…
- FATEH KHAN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1299
Custody; pending criminal proceedings in dispute between the parties; on the consent of both parties, the Supreme Court ordered, will be held in neutral custody.…
- 1968 SCMR 1301 1968 SCMR 1301
Article (58 ()) and Rules of the Supreme Court, X 19566, and X XII, r 1 The special leave for time restriction by application was prayed against the order of the same judge and the letters to file the…
- 1968 SCMR 1303 1968 SCMR 1303
Chief, Settlement Commissioner J once again referring to the successor in the office of the Chief Settlement Commissioner, the second revision and review of Part I has once again been referred to the …
- 1968 SCMR 1304 1968 SCMR 1304
Whether the matter is a sale or an exchange of fact finding cannot be disturbed in the Second Appeal Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), section 100.…
- 1968 SCMR 1305 1968 SCMR 1305
Hearing of the courts operating under Section 497 and the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 307 3ah Section 497 on non-bailable offenses, CR PC medical evidence scrutiny and cancellation of bail …
- 1968 SCMR 1307 1968 SCMR 1307
Article Laches Laches explains that the applicant is awaiting the outcome of a writ petition filed by a third party that is unsatisfactory…
- 1968 SCMR 1308 1968 SCMR 1308
Section 497 will not refuse to exclude the accused accused of a non-bailable offense, should the discretion of the grant of bail in a non-bailable offense be used in a judicial and reasonable manner u…
- 1968 SCMR 1310 1968 SCMR 1310
Section 302/149 considered the evidence of the eyewitness testimony given by the Supreme Court on the plea of the High Court to appeal to the Special Court on appeal of the conviction of the perpetrat…
- SYED MUSHTAQUL HUSNAIN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1311
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 guarantees that there has been an extraordinary delay in handling a criminal case;…
- 1968 SCMR 1311 1968 SCMR 1311
The pre-discrimination case is the fact that a third person has challenged the ownership of the pre-emptor Claimant for non-prosecution Punjab Pre-Impression Act (1913), section 28A…
- 1968 SCMR 1312 1968 SCMR 1312
Section 492 and the Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), before virtually preparing the magistrate for the final stage, the Section 497 Case High Court denied bail, saying that if the evidence justifie…
- 1968 SCMR 1313 1968 SCMR 1313
The Article 23 civil suit is pending agreement between the parties, which is intended to deal not only in resolving civil disputes but also to eliminate criminal cases between the parties, and certain…
Other years — Supreme Court
2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1983 · 1982 · 1981 · 1980 · 1979 · 1978 · 1977 · 1976 · 1975 · 1974 · 1973 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1967 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1962 · 1961 · 1960 · 1959 · 1958 · 1957
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.