Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NABI BAKHSH versus GHULAM.SARWAR


The Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Sections 210 and 497 is the question whether, after an adjudication order made under section 2317 High Court, section 497 jurisdiction to grant bail under the caveat, the Supreme Court Appeal Approved By?

1968 P Cr. L J 1352

[Supreme Court]

Present: A. R. Cornelius, C. J. and Muhammad Yaqub Ali, J

ABDUL SHAKOOR AND 5 OTHERS-Petitioners

Versus

THE STATE-Respondent

Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 335 of 1967, decided on 26th February 1968.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore, dated the 22nd December 1967, in Criminal Bail Application No. 359 of 1967).

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

, Ss. 210 & 497--Question whether after order of commitment made under S. 2317 High Court ceases to have, jurisdiction to grant bail under S. 497-Special) cave to Appeal granted by Supreme Court.

Khalid M. Ishaq, Advocate, Supreme Court (absent) instructed by M. Siddiq, Senior Attorney for Petitioners.

Nemo for the State.

Date of hearing: 26th February 1968.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI, J

. Necessary facts appear in the order dated the 28th December 1967, by which interim bail was granted to the petitioners committed to stand trial under section 307, P: P. C. Relying on the decision of this Court in Muhammad Aslam v. The State (P L D 1967 S C 539 ) a learned Judge in the High Court has refused bail to the petitioners on the view that after an order of commitment has been made under section 210 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the High Court ceases to have jurisdiction to grant bail under section 497. It is contended that the view formed by the learned Judge is not warranted by the decision in Muhammad Aslam v. The State. The petitioner raise a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of section 497, Cr. P. C. W e grant leave to appeal. The interim bail is confirmed.

Leave granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Sihala lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.