Supreme Court — Judgments of 1968
338 reported judgments of the Supreme Court from 1968 — page 4 of 4.
- GUL BAHADUR v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1578
98 Order of the Political Agent in relation to the jurisdiction of the Tribal Areas of the High Court prohibited under the Constitution of 1962 Arts 213 (S) and Article 123 (5) Order, therefore, under…
- NAWAB KHAN,SAWAL KHAN v. THE STATE,MIAN KHAN 1968 PCRLJ 1592
Under Section 308, the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 308 and 103 proved that the complainant had committed criminal misconduct with the buffalo through the culprits' field, so the accused is entitled t…
- SIRAJUDDIN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1594
The appeal filed under Section 491 of the Criminal Code (CCPC) section 491 was rightly dismissed by the High Court's special leave which the Supreme Court refused to appeal.…
- FAQIR RAHMAN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1624
Under Section 302 and 304, the conviction has been changed by the High Court 302, which is punished under Section 304 and the transportation for life is punished, even in the circumstances of the High…
- MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1643
Special leave to appeal against conviction by sections 302 and 307 of the Supreme Court where the facts of the case need to be re-examined.…
- MUHAMMAD NAWAZ,MUHAMMAD NAWAZ v. THE STATE,THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1661
Section 2 302/34 Supreme Court's Special Leave of Appeal to consider whether the High Court's position was correct in spite of the contradictions and contradictions in the case of evidence of construc…
- SIKANDAR v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1668
Four of the accused in section 302 13 were acquitted by the trial court while maintaining the conviction of 9 accused on appeal, accepting the state appeal against acquittal and conviction of the rema…
- MUHAMMAD DAUD v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1671
Sections 497 and 213 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CRPC) Order to prosecute the accused have sufficient scope to deny or revoke bail.…
- NOOR SAMAND v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1672
The Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Article 5 (3) Section 307, PPC question includes only one of the definitions of evidence. The special leave of appeal was rejected by the Supreme Court…
- GHULAM RASOOL v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1673
Section 302 and Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 161, is a special leave to appeal to the special court for the death penalty, that the initial statements of the eyewitnesses are not called…
- SARDARI v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1674
Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Section 416 Bail Pending Appeals The court generally does not intervene in the case of bail protection in exceptional circumstances.…
- ABDULLAH KHAN v. KARAM DAD KHAN 1968 PCRLJ 1680
Special leave for appeal to the Supreme Court against the Pakistan Penal Code Section 307 conviction was asked on the question of the definition of evidence, again the evidence was validated, the cons…
- GULZAR v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1681
Under Section 80 Code 4, 2020 and 8 468 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Section 7 bail7 denied bail, PPC has a reasonable basis for questioning whether it was a crime. For which he is punishable…
- IJAZ ALI KHAN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1686
Under the Criminal Code (CRPC) Section 417, an appeal against a bad appellate court should be kept in mind that the notion of innocence of a convicted defendant is not lightly disputed by the presumpt…
- NIZAM DIN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1686
Section 302 and Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), Section 497 High Court denies bail of the accused in light of the provisions contained in Section 497, Special leave of the PC to appeal against the High …
- SARWAR v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1712
Evidence Act 1872 Section 45 Not only the proof of the handwriting expert, nor the best way to prove a signature or signature Other direct evidence is available It is illegal to accept the evidence di…
- SYED SHABBIR HUSSAIN v. SYED SHABBIR HUSSAIN 1968 PCRLJ 1720
Evidence Act 1872 Section 133, Proof of Diagnostic Confession made by Approval, or Proof of Statement by the Police, can be used only for endorsement or contradiction when the Court of Appeal has give…
- SYED SHARIFUDDIN PIRZADA v. SOHBAT KHAN 1968 PCRLJ 1738
Article 58 (3) of the Constitution of Pakistan 1962 does not attract any authority where special leave of appeal is made only on the basis of the authenticity of the mutual order of the magistrate.…
- Khanzada ABDUL WAHID KHAN v. ABDUL HANIF KHAN 1968 PCRLJ 1742
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 145 High Court reverses special leave for appeal, dismissing magistrate's order on legitimate grounds…
- KHALAS KHAN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1757
The expression of Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) in section 6 436 is not limited to further inquiry CRPC Magistrate Chaudhry XVI, who has already submitted a complaint for further inquiry under secti…
- MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE v. FATEH MUHAMMAD 1968 PCRLJ 1758
Under Section 491M of the Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC), he filed a petition against section 491M, claiming that he had a legally married wife who had not provided any evidence by M. In favor of deli…
- RIAZ HUSSAIN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1770
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 409 government employee failed to account for one thousand rupees from his money, defending his statement that there was nothing in the record to prove the payment of t…
- GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN v. Begum AGHA ABDUL KARIM SHORISH KASHMIRI 1968 PCRLJ 1771
Question about the interpretation of the constitutional provisions of Pakistan Constitution 1962 Article 58 (3) allowed…
- MUHAMMAD v. FAZAL ALI SHAH 1968 PCRLJ 1772
Pakistan Penal Code Section 326 victims suffered serious injuries, three of a serious nature, bail to the accused, special permission to appeal specially denied.…
- SHAKIRULLAH v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1783
The Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Article 58 (3) is a testimony of the prosecution witnesses' testimony on which the applicant has been convicted, which was not properly presented, to appeal the speci…
- ADNAN AFZAL v. CAPT. (Now MAJOR) SHER AFZAL 1968 PCRLJ 1834
Authorization to provide restitution under Section 488 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCPC) and West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964), Sections 5, 20 and SH 48, of the Family Court under …
- MUHAMMAD HAYAT v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1841
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 307 appeal has been accepted by the Supreme Court for a regular hearing on the arguments and stated that the sentence was based on inadequate and biased evidence that w…
- IBRAHIM alias IBRO alias KHALIFA v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1844
The arrest and trial of the prosecution witness by the Criminal Code Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) Section 512 and the Evidence Act (I of 1872), Section 33 felony accused, the fugitive accused Two…
- ASHIQ alias ASHO v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1860
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 307 alleges that a knife was struck in the waist of a person with a knife which, for cautious reasons, was denied by the courts for defense.…
- GHULAM YASIN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1860
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) will not relinquish the excuse of a mere accused of a non-bailable offense to the excuse of bail in a non-bailable offense, judicially and properly under sections 420 a…
- MUHAMMAD BASHIR v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1862
Pakistan Penal Code Section 326 is deliberately inserting a knife into someone else's eye and thus depriving it of its eyes and permanently painting its face. Special appeal denied to the offender's o…
- Raja HAQ NAWAZ v. MUHAMMAD AFZAL 1968 PCRLJ 1867
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 1 56 Qu A Part of Criminal Procedure The provisions of section 1 561A, although each case should not be summarily convened to decide its own particular facts an…
- THE STATE v. ATA MUHAMMAD 1968 PCRLJ 1871
Section 302 arid criminal code of conduct (v. 1898), section 464 accused was found guilty under section 302, PPC, but the trial court relied on medical evidence that at the time of the incident the ac…
- Syed MUSHTAQ AHMAD v. SAUEEQULLAH 1968 PCRLJ 1874
Appeals for special leave to appeal to the special court on appeal of the accused's immunity by the High Court on appeal of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 301: Did the High Court grant the Appellate …
- THE STATE v. KHAN BEG 1968 PCRLJ 1894
Section 2 302/14 accused9 Appeals to the High Court Petition for Special Leave Against the Accused Waiver Circle Revealed that their presence was suspected by the High Court on the basis of unacceptab…
- KHANAN v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1988
Eyewitnesses do not believe in the honor of three of the five accused because they cannot be recovered while the witnesses cannot be present in the present case as well as the rest of the accused as w…
- MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. THE STATE 1968 PCRLJ 1990
Section 302 and the Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), before the 498 case before the magistrate almost ready for the final stage, deny that the accused could be moved to the lower court for bail, if …
- GHULAM HAIDER v. SHEEDA 1968 PCRLJ 437
Pakistan Penal Code Section 301 Appeal by the Sanitary High Court to reduce the death sentence from death sentence to transportation, which is the view of the High Court that the responsibility of the…
Other years — Supreme Court
2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1983 · 1982 · 1981 · 1980 · 1979 · 1978 · 1977 · 1976 · 1975 · 1974 · 1973 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1967 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1962 · 1961 · 1960 · 1959 · 1958 · 1957
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.