Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

versus


Article 58 (3) is nothing on record to justify the intervention of a civil petition for special leave appeal

1968 S C M R 1343 (2)

Present : Muhammad Yaqub Ali and Abdus Sattar, JJ

THE CO‑OPERATIVE FARMING SOCIETY LTD., MULTAN‑Petitioner

versus

IJAZ ALI AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 90 of 1968, decided on 28th June 1968.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore, dated the 23rd January 1968, in Writ Petition No.. 104 of 1966).

Constitution of Pakistan (1961)

---

Art. 58 (3)‑Civil petition for Special Leave to Appeal‑Nothing on record to justify interference‑ Leave refused.

S. Zahir Abbas, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by S. Inayat Hussain, Attorney Supreme Court for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 28th June 1968.

ORDER

ABDUS SATTAR, J.

‑The subject‑matter in dispute in this case is 121 acres of land which was allotted by the Collector, Multan to Ijaz Ali, respondent No. 1. The petitioner‑Society claims that the said land is included within the area allotted to it. The Member, Board of Revenue who dealt with the question observed as follows :‑

"I have seen the allotment order of the area in the Chak in favour of the Society. The land in dispute is not included in the allotment. There are also reports on the file that the land was not included in the allotment of the Society and its possession thereon was not legal. When the land in dispute has never been allotted to the Society, the Society has no authority to take its possession and allot it to the Members."

This decision was challenged in a writ petition and the learned Judges of the High Court dismissed the same holding that the finding of fact made by the Member, Board of Revenue could not be gone into in the proceedings before them unless it was shown that it was not based on any reliable documentary evidence.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to show any document to establish that the finding of the Member, Board of Revenue is without any basis.

The petition is dismissed.

Leave refused.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Eminabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.