Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

DR. ABDUL FATEH versus THE STATE


Whether the West Pakistan Control of Gondas Ordinance 1959, section 18 and 13, under the approval of an appeal under section 18 under section 18, the divisional commissioner has the power to suspend the appeal from the special court appealed by the Supreme Court or Have the option to edit what the question is to consider.

1968 P Cr. L J 863

[Supreme Court]

Present: Fazle‑Akbar and Muhammad Yaqub Ali, JJ

COMMISSIONER; KHAIRPUR DIVISION AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners

versus

ALI SHER SARKI‑Respondent

Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. K‑154 of 1967, decided on 2nd February 1968.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Karachi Bench, Karachi, dated the 29th September 1967, in Petition No. 313 of 1967).

West Pakistan (Control of Goondas) Ordinance (XXXV of 1959)----

-----

Ss. 18 & 13‑Whether during pendency of appeal under S. 18 from order under S. 13, the Divisional Commissioner has power to suspend or modify order of Tribunal‑Special Leave to Appeal granted by Supreme Court to consider question.

Kazi Akhtar Ahmad, Additional Advocate‑General West Pakistan Karachi instructed by Shafiq Ahmad, Senior Attorney for Petitioners.

Nemo for Respondent.

Date of hearing : 2nd February 1968.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI, J

.‑The question raised in this petition for special leave to appeal moved by the State is whether during the pendency of an appeal from an order under section 13 of the West Pakistan (Control of Goondas) Ordinance, 1959 the Divisional Commissioner has the power to suspend or modify the order of the Tribunal.

The Commissioner considered that he was not vested with such s power, but the High Court has, on the analogy of its own revisional jurisdiction come to a contrary conclusion and held that during the pendency of an appeal the Commissioner can pass an order suspending or modifying the order of the Tribunal. The State disputes the construction of the High Court on the ground that the power to suspend or modify an order pending the hearing of the appeal cannot be implied, but must be specifically conferred on the appellate authority.

The question raised is of general public importance and involves interpretation of section 18 of the West Pakistan (Control of Goondas) Ordinance, 1959. We accordingly grant leave to appeal.

Petition accepted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate for immigration from Swatmingora lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.