Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

versus


Of course, Part I person rehabilitation authorities cannot claim a transfer of property on the basis of such unauthorized occupancy by violating property allotted to anyone before December 20, 1958. There may be fewer court appeals.

1968 S C M R 1286

Present : Muhammad Yaqub Ali and Abdus Sattar, JJ

ABDUL GHAFOOR‑Petitioner

versus

SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, RAWALPINDI AND OTHERS -Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 77 of 1968, decided on 27th June 1968.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore, dated the 30th November 1967, in Writ Petition No. 957‑R of 1967).

Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958)---

--- Sch., Part I‑Person trespassing on property allotted by Rehabilitation authorities to another before 20tH December 1958‑Cannot lay claim to transfer of property on basis of such unauthorised occupation much less invoke writ jurisdiction of High Court.

Syed Ali Raza, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Abdur Razzaque Raja, Attorney for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 27th June 1968.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI, J.

‑The petitioner trespassed into house No. P/1160, Rawalpindi, which stood allotted by the Rehabilitation authorities to the respondent No. 3 before the 20th December 1958. The house was accordingly transferred to the respondent in accordance with the notification issued by the Central Government under section 2(6) of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act to the effect that if an allottee could not be given possession due to no fault on his part and ejectment proceedings were initiated against the person in occupation before the 20th December 1958, then such an allottee shall be deemed to be in possession for the purpose of transfer. The petitioner, however, laid claim to the transfer of the house on the basis of his prior possession, but his contention was ruled out.

The High Court declined to interfere with the orders of the Settlement authorities on the view that a trespasser was neither entitled to the transfer of a house under the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act nor competent to move the High Court in the exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction.

The view adopted by the learned Judges is plainly correct and we see no reason to grant leave to appeal. The petition is dismissed.

Leave refused.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocate from Sanghi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.