Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD ISMAIL versus JAFFERI BEGUM


Schedule, Part I and Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 98 JM does not claim transfer of house which has been claimed in favor of JE in writ of transfer of jurisdiction, as a public court. The location refuses to interfere in his favor. Supreme Court denies special leave appeal transfer order

1969 S C M R 34

Present: Muhammad Yaqub Ali and Abdus Sattar, JJ

MUHAMMAD ISMAIL SHAH‑Petitioner

versus

Mst. JAFFERI BEGUM AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 39 of 1968, decided on 9th October 1968.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore dated the 7th November 1967, in Writ Petition No. 367‑R of 1967).

Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958)

---

Sched., Part I and Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Art. 98‑Transfer of house to J‑M having no claim over property attacking order of transfer in favour of J in writ jurisdic tion by acting pro bono public‑High Court, held, rightly declined to interfere with order of transfer‑Special Leave to Appeal refused by Supreme Court.

A. R. Shaukat, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Khawaja Wali Muhammad, Senior Attorney for Petitioner.

Abid Hasan Minto, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Sheikh Abdul Karim, Attorney for Respondent No. 1.

Nemo for Respondents Nos. 2 to 4.

Date of hearing : 9th October 1968.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI, J.

‑We agree with the learned Judges in the High Court that the petitioner who had entered into a compromise with Mst. Jafferi Begum, respondent, in regard to apportionment of the property in dispute between its various occupants was debarred from invoking the writ jurisdiction of the High Court. Indeed he does not lay claim to the disputed property, but attempted to act pro bono publico on the allegation that Mst. Jafferi had not filed a proper Settlement form and was not in omsession of the property transferred to her. The High Court has, in the circumstances, rightly dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner to call in question the transfer in favour of Mst. Jafferi Begum.

The petition for leave to appeal is dismissed.

Leave refused.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Mian Chunnu lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.