Supreme Court — Judgments of 1969
519 reported judgments of the Supreme Court from 1969 — page 5 of 6.
- MUHAMMAD SHAFI v. STATE 1969 SCMR 810
In each case read with Section 409 Criminal Code (V9 1898), Sections 222 (2) and 234, explain the total amount on criminal violations of trust in relation to four counts of misconduct and two specific…
- FEROZE v. ABDUL MAJID KHAN 1969 SCMR 814
The second appeal pursuant to the agreement was the agreement between the parties after the termination of the tenants and 15 tenants applied by the controller. 1872), section 116…
- BADRI NARAYAN AGARWALA v. STATE 1969 SCMR 816
There is no evidence to record Section 23 to show that the value of imported machinery was not less than that shown in the invoice penalty under Section 23.…
- MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. FATEH KHATOON 1969 SCMR 818
Section 23 contract that was executed by the husband at the time of the marriage - if he violates any of the terms of the contract, she will pay Rs 2,000. Contracting a second marriage and restraining…
- ZUBAIDA BEGUM v. ABDUL HAMEED 1969 SCMR 819
Article Pers 98 The writ petitioner neither parties to the litigation patent appeal but also passed orders affecting his claim in the disputed real estate even though the High Court justified in passi…
- LALA v. STATE 1969 SCMR 821
In section 302 and Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), section 374 sentenced to death and sentenced to death under appeal and reference section 374, dissenting between the judges of the PC Division Be…
- JUMMA KHAN v. STATE 1969 SCMR 826
Section 6 526 Criminal Case The High Court did not interfere with the transfer order from Sukkur to a criminal court in Lahore on the basis of the applicant's reasonable grounds that he had been arres…
- AHMI v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 837
The exchange of positions under section 288 under section 288 depends on the exercise of discretion by the evidence so it was moved, the only question admissible to be admissible evidence, which can b…
- ABDUL HADI v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 843
Section 5 (2) Government employees working in the illegal rehabilitation department accept 10 persons as evacuations as a basis for receiving a person's appeal about eviction. , Money, in the circumst…
- GAHNO v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 849
Section 9339 The trial court held that the trial court held that the defendant did not comply with the terms of the waiver because he made some false statements in the trial and before the sessions co…
- FATEH DIN v. MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE 1969 SCMR 854
A certified copy of the decision for delivery on the twelfth, r 1 24 7 67…
- NAWAB v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 855
Attack on Section 302 accused A is being subjected to aggression when he was seen as interfering to prevent the shootings of the accused on AB but himself in the proceedings under section 302 on the a…
- MUHAMMAD SHAFI v. STATE 1969 SCMR 860
Evidence against only one accused: Sections 396 and 412: Recovery of a portion of stolen property received under Section 396 turned into a one under Section 412.…
- MUHAMMAD ISHAQ & SONS v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE 1969 SCMR 864
Article 98 Other Measures An angry party with an open civil suit has the right to appeal the failure to take advantage of an opportunity in which the decision cannot be challenged by asserting the wri…
- MONIRUDDIN AHMAD v. SHAMSUDDIN AHMAD 1969 SCMR 873
Section 106 notice was sent by registered post but returned with confirmation by postal authorities. Section 27 Evidence Act (1 of 1872), Section 114, Illusion (E)…
- ABDUL KARIM v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 881
Appeal to remove remarks from Section 1 561 decision dismissed applicant without hearing the petition…
- MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 885
The fiduciary relationship between the complainant and the accused, in any case, in section 302 and the Evidence Act (I of 1872), in any case, is of little importance to the possibility of making fals…
- ABDUL GHANI v. MUHAMMAD SHARIF 1969 SCMR 889
Extra-Territory Settlement Authorities have broad powers to resolve such errors at any time under Section 11.…
- JAN MUHAMMAD v. THE CROWN 1969 PCRLJ 893
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 34 and 302 have been jointly charged with the murder of B whether they were assisted or would need assistance at any stage to prepare for the crime or to kill 13 of the vi…
- LAKSHMI NARAYAN JEW v. PROVINCE, OF EAST PAKISTAN 1969 SCMR 898
Section 34 Accounts, entries in the books of my production of calculation do not prove everything to be entered into. The party relies on entries to prove that they are in fact correct.…
- Agha MAZHAR HUSSAIN v. THE CROWN 1969 PCRLJ 904
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 421 No complicated question of law or fact that justifies appellate court dismissal…
- TAJA v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 907
In such a case, the other, in accepting only one of the two offenders, section 302, has a keen interest in being subject to section 133 of the Criminal Evidence Act (Constitution of 1872).…
- FAZLE MALIK v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 908
Sections 302 and 304 of the existence of the tomb and the charge of sudden provocation changed from section 302 to section 304…
- MEHRAJ DIN v. SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER 1969 SCMR 913
The occupier of this part of the Act (XXVIII of 1958), Schedule, Part I of the building declared by the Settlement Authorities, cannot claim another part of the building because the law does not permi…
- BAHAR MUHAMMAD v. CHIEF SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER 1969 SCMR 915
Distribution of the successor of the house on the post of Chief Settlement Commissioner, Schedule, Part I, Act (1958).…
- MUHAMMAD AYUB v. SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER 1969 SCMR 916
Article Success 98 Consistent Applications The mother was not charged with any negligence prior to the petition filed by the mother during the minority of the applicant. Upon reaching the majority of …
- EBRAM CORPORATION v. CENTRAL AGENCY LTD. 1969 SCMR 917
Such contract will be finalized under a Government-issued notification under the U. S. Economic Aid under the Import of Imports of Damages Dealing with Termination of Contract Contracting, when the Di…
- IKRAMULLAH v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 920
The contempt of court falls under the purview of section 2 (3) of the Act, 1926 and the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), section 228, of the person convicted of the offense, section 228. I have no juris…
- MUHAMMAD ALI v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 923
No penalty can be imposed for more than 9 months in Pakistan Penal Code Sections 161 and 65 fines…
- GIASUDDIN v. THE CROWN 1969 PCRLJ 925
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 406 and 420 long delay in filing complaint and disappearance of complainant at cross examination…
- SOHAVI v. THE CROWN 1969 PCRLJ 926
Pakistan Penal Code Section 300, exception 1 is applicable only when serious and sudden provocation has led to self-control, the accused with heavy weapons and several persons to avenge the beating of…
- KHUDA BAKHSH v. MUHAMMAD SHARIF 1969 SCMR 928
Delegation of powers through notification in section (31 (?) of the Official Gazette requires that an appeal be made exclusively by the Supreme Court for consideration of this section).…
- FAQIR MUHAMMAD v. SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER 1969 SCMR 930
There is no jurisdiction to interfere with the order of the High Court Settlement Options in the Shade, Part I division or otherwise writ petition.…
- HABIB AHMAD v. YAKOOB KHAN 1969 SCMR 932
Schedule, Part I premises have been divided into several units and each unit has been declared an independent house.…
- HABIB AHMAD v. YAKOOB KHAN 1969 SCMR 933
O II, rr 2 and 3 and O XXIII, r I am withdrawing a portion of the claim from the plaintiff, expressly presenting my statement on the statement that he is taking a new court case for such a claim. But …
- BUTA v. THE CROWN 1969 PCRLJ 934
There is no evidence that the prosecution's witness statement that the accused was present at the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 325 and 326 indicates that he was involved in attacking the injured perso…
- MUHAMMAD LATIF v. CHIEF SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER 1969 SCMR 935
Question 11 and 19 is whether under Section 11, the Chief Settlement Commissioner has the authority to cancel a controlled allotment under the provisions of section 19 which provides for a time limit …
- MIRZA KHAN v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 936
Punishment under Section 307/149 Under 307/149, it is not known that at least five people participated in the attack.…
- MUNJAWAR v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 937
Section 105 of the Evidence Act 1872 The man has been charged with stabbing his friend Pulia to prove that his death was the result of an accident. 1860), sections 302 and 304A…
- JAHAN KHAN v. SULEMAN 1969 SCMR 942
Article 98 Lex Wright petitions precisely excluded on the basis of village only…
- NAZIR AHMAD v. NIZAM DIN 1969 SCMR 943
Sections 18 and 19 were read with the Pakistan Rehabilitation Act (XLII of 1956); in any appropriate case, the authorities having the Section I1 settlement have broad powers under Section 11 of the Pa…
- ABDUL REHMAN v. ANWAR BEGUM 1969 SCMR 945
O IX, r 9 The preceding injunction signed sufficient evidence that there was a reason for not appearing before the High Court; Done…
- BEGUM MAHMOODA BASHIR v. TAHIRA GULZAR 1969 SCMR 948
r 19 Read with the Municipal Administration Ordinance (Secs 125 and 3 (8)), only the Commissioner is eligible to hear the election petition under R19 of the Rules, an additional Commissioner in the ab…
- ANWAR ALI v. CHIEF SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER 1969 SCMR 950
Schedule, Part I and Settlement Scheme No 1 and Para 22 house by the Department of Excise and Taxation are estimated at 300 paise but the price is shown in the municipal register at 180 paise: Clashin…
- GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN v. MUHAMMAD HAYAT 1969 SCMR 954
Volume I, r 7 3 (a) and (b) for the special leave appeal that the Supreme Court has approved for consideration, the question of interpretation of r 7 3 (a) and (b).…
- MASOOD v. AMEER BAKHSH 1969 SCMR 955
Shade, Part I and Settlement Scheme No. VIII High, the court in the writ petition (against the Settlement Authority order) ordered that the house be resolved in accordance with the settlement before t…
- SALAH-UD-DIN v. ABDUL HAYEE 1969 SCMR 957
Schedule, Part 1 and Section 2 (6) Requires the Department of Rehabilitation to change the allotment in favor of their son to a regular allottee on retirement from public employment, is only nominated…
- MUHAMMAD JAMIL v. SHAHADAT ALI 1969 SCMR 958
The schedule was transferred to the First House man who is not in possession of the same special leave that was approved by the Supreme Court for legal status or otherwise.…
- KHUDA BUX v. THE CROWN 1969 PCRLJ 958
Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCPC), in which it will be identified and confessed, and the person presenting the confession offense, has been handed over to the police confession. ), …
- AHMAD v. AMATUR REHMAN 1969 SCMR 959
Schedule, Part I, Transfer of Home to an Older Woman (Homeless Displaced Person, Although Unclaimed) on the basis that she / the well-connected and capable Old Woman Round Ground, who is not a foreign…
- GHULAM ABBAS v. BASHIR-UD-DIN 1969 SCMR 960
Twelfth, r 1 Delay explanation that the applicant's daughter was ill so could not be filed on time.…
- SARDAR BEGUM v. SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY 1969 SCMR 962
O XXVI review point cannot be provoked for the first time after a review not taken…
- QAMAR DIN v. MAULA BAKHSH 1969 SCMR 963
The question of discrimination in the Schedule, Part I House, is the sole and sole authority of the High Court, which rightly refuses to interfere with the writ jurisdiction.…
- ALI v. THE CROWN 1969 PCRLJ 963
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 556 High Court Judge, without competent arguments, preferred appeal against sentence, sentenced to re-trial and sentenced to death after re-trial. The Division …
- MUHAMMAD NAWAZ KHAN v. SETTLEMENT AUTHORITIES 1969 SCMR 964
The home law schedule gives Part I Division Settlement Authority full powers to decide how the house should be divided. The question is whether the shop should also be included in the house, in the wr…
- HABIBULLAH KHAN v. PAK. CEMENT INDUSTRIES LTD 1969 SCMR 965
Section 115 and O. XIII, r 2 the party is permitted to record on certain documents after the court has constituted the matter, refusing to admit such evidence in the oral or documentary case so that t…
- QAMAR-UD-DIN v. N. A. QUREISHY 1969 SCMR 966
r ((i) Proviso is not ultra-virus. In the pre-trial investigation of a person's case in 1959, the completion of 26 years of service under the Public Code (Scrutiny) rules does not prohibit the investi…
- HASSAN MUHAMMAD v. GHULAM MUHAMMAD 1969 SCMR 967
Questions: Whether allotted: homeless people have full ownership rights to the land granted under the Landless Settlement Act, 1958, and whether the sale of the land by such person is subject to prema…
- ABDUL LATIF v. ABDUL SHAKOOR 1969 SCMR 968
Article 98 Election Disputes Holding the latest application of written petition against the tribunal's order passed in the art election petition, the pendency writ petition, but the writ petition did …
- LAL DIN v. THE CROWN 1969 PCRLJ 969
The common purpose of Sections 302/149 and 326/149, which includes the six accused, was neither to cause death nor to make it possible for them to know the death, except in the case of all the accused…
- ABDUL RASHID v. THE CROWN 1969 PCRLJ 971
Whether the Pakistan Penal Code Section 300 murder conviction falls on a person who relies on immunity under the burden of proof.…
- SHER ALI v. THE CROWN 1969 PCRLJ 973
The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 300 and 302 intend to kill the accused A, instead causing B's death, he was nevertheless convicted of murder…
- CHENAB WOOLLEN & TEXTILE MILLS LTD. v. PAKISTAN 1969 SCMR 974
Section 2 (f) and First Schedule, Item 15 (c) includes any incidental or subcontracting to the CA in word preparation that involves the manufacture of manufactured product calendaring materials for wo…
- F. A. SALEEM v. CHIEF SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER 1969 SCMR 976
Landlord and Tenant Tenancy Forced Individual Landlord Denies Relationship to Landlord and Tenant…
- TAJ MUHAMMAD v. FATEMA 1969 SCMR 978
Schedule, Part 1 and Section 2 (12) Settlement Officers are eligible to declare which portion of the premises should be shop and which house.…
- MATIULLAH v. KAFEEL AHMAD SHAH 1969 SCMR 979
Schedule I: Did a person file a CH at CH time, whether the writ petition could be entered by the High Court or the special leave of appeal by the Supreme Court to consider the question?…
- H. M. NASEER ARABIAN v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 979
Courts contempt of court Act 1926 Section 2 (i) The article states that the magistrate was suspected of influence and that he had united with any party in the motion before him, writing tendency, hold…
- ALI KHAN v. THE CROWN 1969 PCRLJ 981
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 421, whether or not records are sought for the appellate court's discretion, no complex question of fact or law arose, and the appeal of reproducing the entire …
- MIR DAD alias AMIR DAD v. THE CROWN 1969 PCRLJ 982
Section 149 of the Pakistan Penal Code section is divided into two parts: Crime by an unlawful assembly member against the common purpose of the assembly. And about the crime that the members of the L…
- MUHAMMAD YOUNIS alias CHEENA v. THE CROWN 1969 PCRLJ 987
If false evidence is falsely acknowledged, the sentence can still be retained if the remaining evidence after improperly admitting the evidence was found under the Evidence of Punishment Act (I of 187…
- BARKAT ALI alias GHARIBU v. THE CROWN 1969 PCRLJ 1001
Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Section App App8 Permission for Extra Evidence at the Appeal Stage Court's Appeal for the Preparation of Extra Evidence The Court does not require permission to examine …
- HASSAN v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1007
The mere presence of the accused is not enough to prove a crime under section 34 of the Pakistan Penal Code section, evidence of some degree of action by each accused in the pursuit of joint intent.…
- GHULAM MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1010
Section 2 & 2 and Part 30 Special, Part Two, to consider the special leave to appeal to the Special Court, in convicting a judge, the sentence may proceed on the theory that the offense was committed …
- MUHAMMAD BACHAL v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1011
Section 5 of the Anti-Corruption Prevention Act, 1947, shows no evidence of unlawful happiness that the accused had even touched or handed over the bribe money, only this proof of the complainant's se…
- SAFDAR HUSSAIN v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1020
Pakistan Penal Code Section 394 Establishment of association with other accused by clear proceedings, conduct or other circumstances to secure the conviction of article robbery, other partner involved…
- SEKANDAR BAYATI v. THE CROWN 1969 PCRLJ 1021
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 396 statement of the dacoity clearance was collected by credible evidence from the accused along with the accused for the exhibition and they were seen at a place where…
- ZILLE HASNAIN KAZMI v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1025
Section 5 (2) Prevention of Corruption Act 1947 Section 5 (2) Unlawful or fraudulent use of property by a public servant misconduct, punishable under Section 12, however, Section 409, PPC Panel Code (…
- SHAMSUL HAQUE No. II v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1028
Pakistan Penal Code Section 411 accused was momentarily spotted the stolen property in a bag and placed it in a rickshaw with the bag owner (another accused, who has been charged with theft). There is…
- QURBAN ALI v. THE CROWN 1969 PCRLJ 1029
The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 201 and 218 did not set aside the sentence on the basis of required knowledge and intention…
- MD. SONAFAR ALI v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1042
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 342 Proof of crime against each and every case is proved against him, while investigation under Section 342 should be brought before the accused, however, There…
- Moulvi ALI GOHAR v. THE CROWN 1969 PCRLJ 1047
The version presented, the rest of the evidence, and the probability of the case to be accepted after the examination, should be relied upon in such a manner that the court should be satisfied that it…
- RAHMAT v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1067
Pakistan Penal Code Section 300, Exception 4 Sudden Fighting Court Appropriate Possibility to Review All Evidence Presented by Prosecution and Defense…
- MUSHTAQ MUHAMMAD KHAN v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1084
Sections 4 (3) (4) and (5) of the Pakistan Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1958. Later, it cannot be read as proof. Ordered his trial…
- SERAJ MIA v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1090
Pakistan Penal Code Section 4 304, Part II, was jointly attacked by three suspects, and to prove their conviction, the evidence of death of the abductor for a long period of abdomen, which of the thre…
- HUSSAIN ALI SHAH v. THE CROWN 1969 PCRLJ 1091
Pakistan Penal Code Section 6 Me6 My abduction is not enough to pay fines under the prosecution, it must also prove that the abducted woman was subjected to illicit inter course by force or deception …
- LUTIF ALI SHAH v. THE CROWN 1969 PCRLJ 1102
Pakistan Penal Code Section 420 declared a crime…
- Mirza SHAM BEG v. THE CROWN 1969 PCRLJ 1105
Sections 266, 305, 307 and 308 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCPC), using the original criminal jurisdiction, after the session case were resigned from the High Court by a jury procedure. Returns…
- ALLAH DITTA v. THE CROWN 1969 PCRLJ 1108
Section 302 was the last time the accused was found alive in the company of the accused while the failure to present the allegations was found to be a crime under the Proof of Evidence Act (I of 1872)…
- Malik ASAD KHAN v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1110
The Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) The authority to summon and examine section 540 supplementary witnesses After the conclusion of the determination proceedings, is the trial court capable of solicit…
- MUHAMMAD SHARIF v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1113
Criminal Procedure Code (CR PC) Section 164 Acknowledging Magistrate Recording Acknowledging the delay in this case after 3 years, in the Magistrate's investigation, it is not enough to doubt his susp…
- THE COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS v. S. M. YUSUF 1969 PCRLJ 1122
Constitution Pakistan 1962 Article 58 (3) The question is whether the High Court is justified in granting immovable order, only in the case of an appeal for special leave to exclude an appeal of educa…
- MEHRUN NISA v. THE CROWN 1969 PCRLJ 1124
Evidence of a Section 5 (2) partner of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, cannot be accepted without free association.…
- NAZIM alias NAZER BISWAS v. THE CROWN 1969 PCRLJ 1138
Pakistan Penal Code Section 304, Second Party Occupied Partying Party Attacked And Chased By Another Party - Turning One Of The Runaways Kills One Of The Attackers…
- KHUSHI MUHAMMAD v. THE CROWN 1969 PCRLJ 1153
Direct evidence cannot be expected if the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 34 and 302 are combined with joint intent facts and circumstances.…
- DALILUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY v. THE CROWN 1969 PCRLJ 1156
Insufficient conviction for proof of approval of Pakistan Penal Code Section 400 Duty has been set aside…
- ANAYAT ULLAH v. THE CROWN 1969 PCRLJ 1160
The Evidence Act 1872 does not monitor or control Section 32 and Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), Section 164 Section 164, CR PC Section 32, Evidence Act, 1872.…
- FAKKU MIA alias MOTAHAR v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 1193
Evidence of conspiracy by witnesses and Jesus' detectives regarding conspiracy to commit murder in Pakistan Panel Code Section 120B…
- HASSU v. THE CROWN 1969 PCRLJ 1209
Criminal Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) Section 337 and Evidence Act (I of 1871), Section 133…
- GHULAM NABI SHAH v. THE CROWN 1969 PCRLJ 1217
The declaration cited in the Evidence Act 1872 Section 6, Illustration (a) illustration should have a substantial degree of harmony with the Act.…
- DARYA KHAN v. THE CROWN 1969 PCRLJ 1233
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) This time bull bulls are running behind the bulls on which they are trying to illegally capture or arrest a timely element where there is only one transaction in the en…
Other years — Supreme Court
2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1983 · 1982 · 1981 · 1980 · 1979 · 1978 · 1977 · 1976 · 1975 · 1974 · 1973 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1967 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1962 · 1961 · 1960 · 1959 · 1958 · 1957
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.