Supreme Court — Judgments of 1969
519 reported judgments of the Supreme Court from 1969 — page 4 of 6.
- THE SUPERINTENDENT, LAND CUSTOMS TORKHAM (KHYBER AGENCY) v. ZEWAR KHAN 1969 PLD 485
An analysis of the various constitutional provisions relating to the constitutional status and history of the tribal areas, both the administrative and legislative areas of the tribal areas, to the Co…
- SERAJ MIA v. STATE 1969 SCMR 490
Section 4 304, Part II, Section 34, read with three suspects who died of long-term abdominal cramps for jointly assaulting and confessing. Read with section 34…
- THE COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX, LAHORE REGION, LAHORE v. MESSRS ASSOCIATED HOTELS (INDIA) LTD., LAHORE 1969 PTD 490
The Sales Tax Act, 1951, Section 27 (2), the Department of Taxes can only insist on realizing the assessment demand raised by it and the amount deposited in the treasury at the time of assessment cann…
- HUSSAIN ALI SHAH v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 491
Section 6 366 My abduction is not sufficient for the offense under the section Prosecution, the intention must also prove that the abducted woman was subjected to illegal inter-course torture by force…
- AHMAD KHAN v. CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY 1969 PTD 494
The State Duty Act 1950 section 38 is an estimate of cultivated and cultivated land of 17,922 production index units whose value of production unit is Rs. 10 per unit for the purpose of estate duty.…
- RASHID AHMAD v. ABDUL MAJID 1969 SCMR 512
Articles 123 and 58 (3) of contempt of court cannot be challenged before the Supreme Court by requesting a special leave appeal under Article 123 to issue a contempt of court notice.…
- MUHAMMAO YUSUF v. HAWA 1969 SCMR 513
Agricultural land lease not valid for more than 10 years without the prior permission of Section 8 (b) collector. But it's outlawed.…
- MESSRS MACNEILL & BARRY LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST PAKISTAN 1969 PLD 514
Article 158, Fitness Certificate by the High Court under Constitution of Pakistan (1956), Section 109 (c) and 110 and read with ACGV, RR 3 and 4, CPC, defective and Is not compliant, on the basis of w…
- COMMISSIONER, HYDERABAD v. MUHAMMAD 1969 SCMR 515
The Commissioner, in his order in regard to the Tribunal, said that it was in the interest of justice to send the matter to the Tribunal, which he did not say was in the interest of justice to prosecu…
- NOORA v. SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER 1969 SCMR 517
Article fact 98 The finding of the facts is justified in overturning such a finding in the High Court, writ jurisdiction based on clear and unambiguous misrepresentation of evidence.…
- MESSRS ATA HOSSAIN KHAN LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST PAKISTAN, DACCA 1969 PLD 517
Income Tax Act 1922 Section 10 (2) (xvi) Business Expenses Managing Director Compensation costs are incurred and such expenses cannot be ruled out using certain subjective standards of rationality onl…
- MUHAMMAD SHARIF v. STATE 1969 SCMR 521
Section 164 confessed crime, magistrate recording, 3 years probation due to unusual delay in delay in case, in magistrate's inquiry, it is not enough to make suspicions (XLV of 1860), section 302…
- MESSRS BADRI NARAYAN AGARWALA v. MESSRS PAK. JUTE BALERS LTD 1969 PLD 524
The Arbitration Act 1940 First Schedule, CL (3) will award the expression within four months of its entry on the reference.…
- MACNEILL & BARRY LIMITED v. MACNEILL & BARRY LIMITED 1969 PLD 527
Section 42 (1) of the Income Tax Act 1922 Section 42 business dealings with the managing agency, whether in a business and connection situation between the managing agents and the managed company and …
- MUHAMMAD HANIF v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 529
Order of trial by the lower appellate court on appeal under Section 417, CRPR, although the illegal Supreme Court will not interfere with the Code of Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), Section 417…
- FAZAL MUHAMMAD v. NABI BAKHSH 1969 SCMR 531
Section 16 Irreversible Impact Question Whether irrelevant influence can be established on proven facts. In particular, there may be a question of law as to whether the governing authority or influenc…
- ABDUL HAMID v. MUHAMMAD SHAHIDULLAH 1969 PLD 535
The appeal of the Supreme Court against the order passed by the High Court in the writ jurisdiction against the order of the Election Tribunal pending the Constitution of Pakistan (1962), and the nati…
- RAHMAT v. STATE 1969 SCMR 537
Section, ception,, exception S Suitable possibility for review of all evidence presented by the trial court prosecution and defense…
- SNAHALATA CHOWDHURY v. OSTAR MIA 1969 PLD 540
The East Bengal State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 retains section 3 and section 20 (2) of the tenant receiving shares, which is not exempt from all restrictions.…
- RADBA KANTA BANIK v. THE PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN 1969 PLD 545
Approval Section 3 of the East Bengal (Emergency) Property Act 1948 for the purpose of concern for private business and for the purpose of obtaining and not for public purpose or illegal in the public…
- JUMA KHAN v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 545
In the notice under section 422 of the Criminal Code (CR PC) Section 422, the notice of counsel is usually sent to the practitioner outside the seat of the court notice, in the absence of evidence to …
- BROJENDRA KISHORE ROY v. MOHINI MOHAN 1969 SCMR 547
Under Article 142, defeating the title holder must be such as to prevent the owner from enjoying the property for the purpose for which he intended to use it. The title holder must have a sufficient d…
- M. A. JALIL v. THE STATE 1969 PLD 552
The Pakistan Penal Code section 201 and Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 239 (d), several accused committed the murder of one of the two provisions and the disappearance of evidence on the …
- SHAM BEG v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 555
Sections 266, 305, 307 and 308 of the Sindh Chief Court, using the original criminal jurisdiction, apply the sessions as trial for jurisdiction through the jury procedure under section 305 (4) of sect…
- MIRZA KHAN v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 558
Sections 2 302 and, 4, Exception 4 were allegedly involved in an altercation with his brother and two other men (unarmed) while sliding inside his house, lifting a knife and stabbing him directly in t…
- ALLAH DITTA v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 558
Section 302 was the last time the accused was found alive in the company of the accused while the failure to present the allegations was found to be a crime under the Proof of Evidence Act (I of 1872)…
- ASAD KHAN v. STATE 1969 SCMR 560
The authority to summon and examine sub-540 subpoenas after the conclusion of the determination proceedings, whether the trial court is capable of summoning and examining subpoenaed witnesses [Queer]…
- ABDUL QUDDUS v. CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER 1969 SCMR 561
Orders made by the Section 22 Administration can be amended only under the Act of Minister for Rehabilitation and Works under appeal or revision which cannot be contested by the Chief Settlement Commi…
- Haji WALI MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 561
Criminal conviction under Section 497 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CRPC) requires that the guilty bail be allowed to go public unless there is a strong basis for proof of conviction. Don't exist Cr…
- LUTIF ALI SHAH v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 564
Section 101010 Conviction of a person guilty of a crime. A charge of committing a baseless intent…
- SRI MANMATHA NATH KURI v. MOULVI MUHAMMAD MOKHLESUR REHMAN 1969 PLD 565
West Pakistan Motor Vehicles Act 1939 Section 96 Decisions Against Insurers Against Third-Party Risks Suits insurance under the Fatal Accidents Act, 1855, although the party does not conform to it, if…
- ALAM KHAN v. GHAUS MUHAMMAD 1969 PCRLJ 565
The sanction of a section 302 conviction cannot be based on testimony unless it is substantiated by independent evidence unless there is talk of guilt and the culprits involved. Section 337…
- NOOR MUHAMMAD v. MUHAMMAD NAWAZ 1969 PCRLJ 567
Confession of a crime taken by a magistrate on the basis of a negative report of the police under section 173, 190 and 191 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCPC), section 190 (1) of section 190 (1).…
- SYED ALI v. SIDDIQ ALI 1969 SCMR 567
Article 98 The finding of fact, which was not in any way interfered with by the High Court's special leave 7, was rejected by the Supreme Court.…
- MEHRUN NISA v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 574
Section 5 (2) partner's evidence cannot be accepted without independent cooperation…
- MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 576
Section 7 437 case under Section 2 under2, PPC Inquiring Magistrate Framing Charge Uncle, Section 4 304A, PPC only Sessions Judge acting under Section 43 437, PC authorized, in such cases, of lower co…
- AHMAD BAKHSH v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 577
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 Convicted of murder before Sessions Court on High Court The High Court may refuse to approve the bail by endorsement…
- MOSAM KHAN v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 579
Subject to Schedule I (81) of section 167 (81) of the Customs Act 1878 and the Schedule to Article 168 of the possession of the goods to 182 persons, the prosecution does not depend on the first decis…
- PAKISTAN CEMENT INDUSTRIES LTD. v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN 1969 SCMR 582
O XXXI, r 1 provisional order was not found to misuse the lower court in denying the injunction order which was not interfered with by the Supreme Court suit for the declaration which was the Cement S…
- ALLAHDINO v. FAKIR MUHAMMAD 1969 PLD 582
Sections 8 and 7 of the West Pakistan Board of Revenue Act, 1957, applicant in the dark about the order within ninety days from the date of this word or in Article (2) of the order of section 8 (2) of…
- ARSHAD & CO. v. RAIS GHAZI MUHAMMAD SHABIR AHMAD 1969 SCMR 594
Article 58 (3) and the Evidence Act (1 of 1872), Section 114, Illusions (f) Requesting a Special Request for Appeal of Notice by Registered Post AD that Appeals for Hearing any Day After Receipt of a …
- COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS v. S. M. YUSUF 1969 SCMR 595
Article (3 ()) The question is whether the High Court was correct in giving immovable injunction, only in one case did the appeal for a special leave of educational interest be dismissed.…
- BHOPAT SINGH v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 597
Under the Act, the approval of pay orders does not make the government illegal…
- KHUSHI MUHAMMAD v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 599
Direct evidence cannot be expected for the purposes of Articles 34 and 302 combined with the facts and circumstances surrounding the case.…
- NABI AHMED v. HOME SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN, LAHORE 1969 PLD 599
The first reference of the Tribunal read with the Schedule to the West Pakistan Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1963, Section 3, is based on the fact that Section 109 was filed under Commissioner (after…
- DALILUR RAHMAN v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 602
Insufficient conviction for proof of approval of section 400 dossier has been set aside…
- ANAYAT ULLAH v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 606
Does not override or control Section 32 and Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), Section 164 Section 164, CR PC Section 32, Proof of Act, 1872.…
- CEMENT AGENCIES LTD v. THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER, CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, KARACHI AND ANOTHER 1969 PTD 607
Income Tax Act, 1922 Section 34 (2A), Words to Receive Word \ and \ Emerging \ means when income received from agency commission is finalized on 31 7 1947 and amount for accounting year 1946 47. So in…
- INCOME-TAX OFFICER, CENTRAL CIRCLE II, KARACHI AND ANOTHER v. CEMENT AGENCIES LTD 1969 PTD 611
Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Article 63 Supreme Court decisions do not affect past and closed transactions based on the decision of the judicial proceedings, which are finally settled according to th…
- MADAN GOPAL v. MARAN BEPARI 1969 PLD 617
Rule Civil Code 1908 Section 100 Second Appeal The fact finding was heard in parallel with the trial by the First Appellate Court. The court failed to hold material evidence through record or appellat…
- FAKKU MIA v. STATE 1969 SCMR 620
Conspiracy is not relied upon by witnesses and accused droppers as evidence for compiling Section 120B murder evidence…
- HASSU v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 621
The close association with the accused of the necessary sanction on the basis of the evidence of mutual assistance in section 7 337 and the Evidence Act (I7272), section 133 does not preclude his test…
- MESSRS HAIDER AUTOMOBILE LTD v. PAKISTAN 1969 PLD 623
Under the Second Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan 1962, the Second Schedule does not serve as the President's personal post.…
- GHULAM NABI SHAH v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 629
In other words, the statement cited in Illustration (a) reflects that the Act must have a substantial degree of harmony with the Act.…
- DARYA KHAN v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 637
Article 59 Persons are fleeing from behind the bull They are trying to capture or arrest them The unauthorized time factor is the key factor in cases where a single transaction occurs throughout the i…
- PEHLWAN v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 641
The general item of the assailants, which reads Sections 2 302 and 5 325, which caused serious injury to the two-handed weapon, caused a fatal injury to the victim's head. Also, under section 325/149,…
- KIRIR v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 647
Section 32 Dead Declaration Co-accused Admin Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302…
- MUHAMMAD SALIM v. STATE 1969 SCMR 653
In section 300, exceptions 4, 302 and 304, Part I struck a knife-wielding victim without taking advantage of the sudden fight and then escaped from the trial under Section 300, exception 4-section 304…
- UMAR v. STATE 1969 SCMR 658
Accused present by recovery of blood stained clothing early in the morning after the section 302/149 incident…
- GIRDHARI LAL v. CUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY, WEST PAKISTAN 1969 SCMR 660
Sections 2 (2) and (3) and the Balochistan (Securities Property Protection) Rule (of 1948) vacate the property for the purpose of distinguishing the evacuee from the non-evacuee property. Determining …
- ABDUL RASHID v. STATE 1969 SCMR 666
Section 342 Railway Police Constable arrested a man in connection with his arrest. He is suspected of being involved in an identifiable offense under section 342.…
- AL-HILAL CO-OOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY v. KARACHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 1969 SCMR 667
Section 342 Railway Police Constable arrested a man in connection with his arrest. He is suspected of being involved in an identifiable offense under section 342.…
- WALI MUHAMMAD v. MUHAMMAD AKRAM 1969 SCMR 673
Article ((())) to exclude the case for the parties' own fault and negligence…
- HALIMA BAI v. SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER 1969 SCMR 675
The schedule was transferred to the One Unit by the Deputy Commissioner of the House as a Settlement Commissioner, and the PTO issued the Transfer Settlement Commissioner after which several residents…
- MESSRS ATA HOSSAIN KHAN LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EAST PAKISTAN, DACCA 1969 PTD 679
Income Tax Act 1922 Section 10 (2) (xvi) Business Expenses Managing Director Compensation costs are incurred and such expenses cannot be ruled out using certain subjective standards of rationality onl…
- MAHMOOD AHMAD v. ALLAH DITTA 1969 SCMR 679
Sections 42 read with Rules, 26 and 18 of the Cooperative Society, the appointment of a liquidator and a decree of contribution to the liquidation by all members of the Society to meet the loss suffer…
- SORAB HOMMIE MEHTA v. CHAIRMAN, KARACHI MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE 1969 SCMR 682
Section 97 (?) (a) read with the Municipal Administration Ordinance (X-Oh 1960), Section 4 (2) General Taxes and Fire Brigade Taxes imposed under Section 97 (1) (A) of Karachi Municipal City. Yet enac…
- AZIZULLAH v. ISMAIL 1969 SCMR 684
O XL, r 1 The appointment of the recipient at the discretion of the Supreme Court will not interfere unless the arbitrator is arbitrarily used or irrespective of the recipient's appointment rules.…
- HAJIRAN SUGHRA v. DISTRICT JUDGE AND SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER 1969 SCMR 686
Sections 22 and 23 are included in the Registration of Evacuation Properties in relation to such property in the Homelessness (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958), Shadow, Part I, an…
- SARWAR ABBAS v. MUHAMMAD TAQI RIZI 1969 SCMR 689
Sections 13 and 15 of the Appellate Authority which order the eviction of the tenant under the contract are reached by the party and are directed to give possession to the tenant on 30 966, the execut…
- ARIF AIL SHAH v. PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTAN 1969 SCMR 690
Read with Articles 34 and 35 (3) the Benefits Act (XXXII of 1979), Section 34 Money Suite interest is valid from the date of the notice of claim to the plaintiff's interest, before and after the filin…
- ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN v. MANZOOR HUSSAIN 1969 SCMR 692
Payments arrears in the State of Bounty cannot be subject to any legal proceedings in the civil courts, nor can they provide the basis for gaining the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court once exercised …
- ABDUL RASHID v. STATE 1969 SCMR 693
To exercise or deny bail under Section 497, judicial principles must be exercised at its discretion; it is charged with an offense under Section 161, PPC, Act II of Section S (2), Read with 1947, neit…
- N. W. R. v. ALI ABID 1969 SCMR 695
Article (58 ()) The writ petition for special leave to appeal against the order of the High Court was not brought before the High Court in point of view, though the written statement in response to th…
- NABI AHMAD v. RASHID AHMAD 1969 SCMR 701
Offer to accept the claimant as a tenant in the application for the determination of Section 4 and the Eight Acts (X of 1873), Section 11 Appropriate Rent Letterworld if they state on oath that after …
- ZULFIQAR v. STATE 1969 SCMR 703
In the Recovery Memo, eight items of clothing were shown in the recovery case against the section 396 accused, but there is no evidence that they were the same as identified in court as the accused ha…
- MUHAMMAD AKBAR v. STATE 1969 SCMR 705
Section 2 302 // 34 Attack of the Lattice Plays on the slain with wings…
- COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND LAND CUSTOMS v. IMDAD ALI 1969 SCMR 708
, Deputy Collector of Article 98 High Court, Central and Excise Customs, jurisdiction to impose a fine under the Collector of Section 167, C Customs Act, 1878, in the appeal, to maintain the Deputy Co…
- COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND LAND CUSTOMS v. IMDAD ALI 1969 SCMR 708
Articles 39 and 167, Items (8), and (9b) are generally said to be disproportionate to the declared value imported in the invoice by a proforma (sent by the Deputy High Commissioner of Pakistan). Tried…
- KANDAWALA & CO. LTD. v. RASHIDUDDIN 1969 SCMR 720
The Controller's decision regarding the jurisdiction of Sections 13 and 15, there is no provision under Article 15 on the preliminary issue that the landlord and tenant relationship exists. Order…
- NUR MOHD. v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 724
, Section 3 323, 4 324 and 6 326 Five Persons Section 302 /! The three accused charged under 49, 148 and 324 were acquitted and the remaining two A&N were found guilty under Section 302/34, which was …
- SAID AKBAR v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 726
Article 489 Those who circulate counterfeit currency are as serious a crime as those who are actually involved in counterfeiting.…
- SHEILA v. ZAHID HUSSAIN 1969 SCMR 735
, Sections 304, Hs, I and 11 have made very provocative statements about the Holy Prophet. The accused was accused of provoking the calling of the prophet Karim's aunt, calling 16 King to pick up a pi…
- MUHAMMAD PINIAL v. STATE 1969 SCMR 740
To discredit any officer who has been entrusted with the responsibility of administering justice, the Sub-Inspector of Police, was convinced, the scandal, to publicly enter into a civil judge and effe…
- BASHIR AHMAD v. REGISTRAR, HIGH COURT, LAHORE 1969 SCMR 746
Section 36, members of the High Court Bar Association approve the Inquiry Tout resolution declaring the person to be the Vice President instead of seeking a special meeting, calling for an immediate m…
- UMAR HAYAT v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 748
Unlawful use of a sum of less than Rs 100 only under section 3 of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 408 Reconciliation Ordinance of Courts, 1961, only if all parties agree.…
- QUTBA v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 749
, Section 201, read with Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 239 accused stripped the victim's skull, which hid it less than 3 hours after the murder, and was involved in the charges and trial…
- ZIAUDDIN v. STATE 1969 SCMR 752
Denial of the accused's signature upon receipt of section 409…
- AKHTAR HUSSAIN v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 753
Sections 302/149 and 325/149 Constructive Liability The common purpose of unlawful assembly (equipped with a lathe): Prevent the demolition of a wall in the case of a bailiff on a court order which is…
- ABDUL KARIM v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE AND SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER 1969 SCMR 756
Act (XX8II of 1958), Schedule Part Insurance Building Site Auction Successful Bidder Deposits Honestly Based on the Instructions in Memo No. 983 P PI Is…
- SHAHKOT BUS SERVICE, SHAHKOT v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 764
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 561 The internal powers of the High Court are very broad and unconfirmed.…
- LUTFUR RAHMAN v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 766
Section 161/116 Sub Inspector of Police investigating the seized goods which had already been taken into custody by the Magistrate, was submitted to the Sub Inspector under the conviction that under S…
- SARDAR ALI v. STATE 1969 SCMR 769
Section 302 and the Code of Criminal Procedure (v. 1898), sections 42, 46 and 49 are reaching for condolences after those accused of the riots and their accomplices being separated from the others on …
- DIN MUHAMMAD v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 777
, Section 342 situations in which an attempt can be made to dispel the accused should be placed before the accused if questioned under Section 342.…
- ABDUL REHMAN v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 783
Claims Commissioner working under the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 193, 196, 228 and 471 Claims Commissioner (Claimed Persons) Act 1956, in the sense of Section Criminal Code (V9 1898), Section 476.…
- SIRAJ & CO. v. HABIB BANK LTD 1969 SCMR 784
O XXXVII and Section 15 Small Trials? Can a District Judge's Court or a Senior Civil Judge's Court be established in Lahore?…
- HAMID HUSSAIN v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 793
Article 160 The facts of the case, as presented by the petitioner, require special scrutiny by the Court of Appeal for investigation.…
- ROSHAN AKHTAR v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 798
Sections 7 307 and 4 324 state that, despite being injured, suffered from dangerous weapons, it is not serious and is not subject to Section 4 324 nor does the use of Section 7 307 dangerous weapons a…
- HUKAMZAD v. STATE 1969 SCMR 802
Articles 302 and 96 were read with the Evidence Act (1 of 1872), a section 105 case of self-defense murder which in any case proved to justify presence.…
- MAWASI KHAN v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 809
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 (1) A person charged with an unlawful crime, a 70-year-old man, and medical reports confirm that he was partially disabled and suffering from several illnes…
Other years — Supreme Court
2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1983 · 1982 · 1981 · 1980 · 1979 · 1978 · 1977 · 1976 · 1975 · 1974 · 1973 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1967 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1962 · 1961 · 1960 · 1959 · 1958 · 1957
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.