Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABDUL MAJID versus NISAR AHMAD


The question is whether on the facts of the case found under section 300 (4) of the High Court exception (4), the PPC was requested to be converted to an iction sentence under section 302 (11) under section 302. , PPC was approved by the Special Court for Appeals for the Supreme Court (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 and 304, Part II

1969 S C M R 6

Present : Hamoodur Rahman and Sajjad Ahmad, JJ

ABDUL MAJID‑Petitioner

versus

NISAR AHMAD AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 123 of 1968, decided on 9th October 1968.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore, dated 6‑2‑1968, in Criminal Revision No. 291 of 1966).

Sentence‑--

--Question whether on facts of case as found by High Court exception (4) to S. 300, P. P. C. was rightly invoked to alter ' conviction under S. 302 to one under S. 304 (11), P. P. C.‑Special Leave to Appeal granted by Supreme Court‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302 & 304, Part II.

Munir Ahmad, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Tanvir Ahmad, Attorney for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 9th October 1968.

ORDER

SAJJAD AHMAD, J.

‑The respondent‑Nisar Ahmad was convicted for the murder of Javed, brother of the petitioner (section 302, P. P. C.) and sentenced to transportation for life. On appeal in the High Court the conviction has been altered to one under section 304(11), P. P. C. and sentence reduced to 5 years' R. I. The petitioner's application for enhancement of the respondents's sentence was thus rendered infructuous.

The question requires consideration whether on the facts of the case, as found by the High Court, exception (4) to section 300, P. P. C. was rightly invoked to justify the alteration of the respondent's conviction under section 304(11), P. P. C. and the consequent reduction in the sentence. Leave is granted as prayed for.

Leave granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Gojra lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.