Supreme Court — Judgments of 1969
519 reported judgments of the Supreme Court from 1969 — page 3 of 6.
- UMAR HAYAT v. STATE 1969 SCMR 272
Section 308 by the Court of Arbitration under Section 3 of the Ordinance of the Courts, 1961, only the illicit use of a sum of less than Rs. 100 only if all parties agree.…
- ZAHOOR ELAHI v. FAZAL-UR-RAHMAN 1969 SCMR 274
Article 58 (3) Rules of the Supreme Court, 1956, 0 XIII, r 1 The limitation for filing an appeal for special leave shall begin from the date of the final order of the High Court Ahmed Din v. Messenger…
- ABDUL KADIR v. EAST PAKISTAN PROVINCIAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD 1969 SCMR 275
In section 86 87 and 2 (p) the director (a) of section 86 has the word officer, a member of the bank's managing committee and, therefore, an officer of the bank as defined under section 2 (p), with th…
- SULTAN AHMAD v. SAHU 1969 SCMR 277
A VI, r 17 Claim modification suit merely to declare that the issue of infringement of property by widows will not affect the plaintiff's inverse right, requesting the transfer of the plaintiffs be re…
- AKHTAR HUSSAIN v. STATE 1969 SCMR 278
Article 302/149 and 325/149 Constructive Obligation The common purpose of unlawful assembly (equipped with lumber) is to comply with a court warrant if necessary, for example on a court guarantee to p…
- MUHAMMAD SARWAR v. THE STATE 1969 PLD 278
Compliance with the requirements of Ch XIV of the Special Police Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, under Section 5 (2) of the Anti-Corruption Prevention Act 1947 and Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 161…
- COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX v. ASSOCIATED HOTELS (INDIA) LTD 1969 SCMR 281
Section 27 (2) The Department may insist on assessing the tax demand raised only by it, and any other amount deposited in the treasury on the basis of the estimate which is overpaid by the assessee. T…
- BASANKA LAL BANIK v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN 1969 SCMR 283
Article property The property title dispute question should not be considered in the writ jurisdiction and such questions should be dismissed while rejecting it. The High Court observed with regard to…
- LAHORE-FEROZEPUR TRANSPORT COMPANY v. MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE 1969 SCMR 285
Section 62 (1) does not permit the abolition of a route permit to operate a stage carriage so that a regional tribunal such as the Administrative Tribunal may apply its mind freely to the facts and ci…
- MUHAMMAD SHARIF v. AZIZ ULLAH 1969 SCMR 288
Q XIII, r 1 Delay in filing the application Civil matter is expected to be paid in the other hand after a break, in order to be in permanent contact with the progress of the case legally, so it is mer…
- MAWASI KHAN v. STATE 1969 SCMR 289
Section 497 (0 person charged with a non-bailable offense, a 70-year-old man and medical reports confirm that he was partially disabled and that the High Court, which suffers from several illnesses, d…
- IFTIKHAR HUSSAIN v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN 1969 SCMR 291
The basic provisions of the Government Employee (Public Service Utilities) Rules, 1963, r 3 r 3 are not ultra-virus…
- MUNIR v. STATE 1969 SCMR 294
With the arrest of the accused in the Section 411 article on the utility of the seized offenses, it can be properly drawn that the accused had hidden them there knowing of the stolen articles.…
- MUHAMMAD ABU ZAFAR v. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN 1969 SCMR 298
Against the order dismissing Arts 123 and 98 service, the Right Petition High Court has directed illegal employees not to pay salaries. In terms of salaries arising from nature and therefore no action…
- BHANO v. A. M. SAEED 1969 SCMR 299
The Act (XLVII of 1958), the Chief Settlement Commissioner, permanently settled the land on sections 10 and 16 displaced persons, however, the option to cancel the allotment if the allotment was obtai…
- THE OFFICIAL ASSIGNEE OF THE HIGH COURT OF WEST PAKISTAN v. THE LLOYDS BANK LTD., KARACHI 1969 PLD 301
The Code of Civil Procedure 1908 Section 60A and XXXXXIII, r 5 is liable to be attached to the decree of the banker and the customer.…
- MOHSAN KHAN v. CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER 1969 SCMR 306
Article L 98 is about delays in acquittal, although the suit itself is not yet sufficient for the party. Also, if the treatment is negligent, it may prove to be a good place to refuse extraordinary tr…
- MISS SURRAYYA PARVEEN AND ANOTHER v. SH. ANWARUL HAQ 1969 PLD 309
The Chief Settlement Commissioner of Part I, Schedule I of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958, after a spot inspection found that the alleged factory and its adjoining b…
- MUHAMMAD DIN v. STATE 1969 SCMR 311
Special request Special leave request 1 prohibited over time? No late condolences? Holiday denied…
- ABDUL KARIM v. STATE 1969 SCMR 312
Pending Appeal in Section 426 Bail The perpetrator of a bailable offense cannot claim bail in accordance with the appropriate pending appeal.…
- MUHAMMAD JAWAN v. FAYYAZUDDIN 1969 SCMR 314
The schedule, Part II Shop, provided by the Settlement Authorities, is reliable for spot inspections. The ultimate quest…
- GHULAM MUHAMMAD v. ZIAULLAH KHAN 1969 SCMR 315
Article 98 delays in the pursuit of negligence and procurement are sufficiently limited to the refusal to entertain applications under Article 98.…
- SAHIB DAD KHAN v. COMMISSIONER, RAWALPINDI DIVISION 1969 SCMR 317
Sections 4 and 6 consisting of the same property are considered to be continuous notification prior notice cancellation…
- CEMENT AGENCIES LTD v. THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER, CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, KARACHI 1969 PLD 318
Section 34 (2A) of the Income Tax Act, 1922, the words' acquiring \ and \ emerging \ mean when the income received from the agency commission is finalized on 31 7 1947 and amount for the accounting ye…
- ABDUL REHMAN v. STATE 1969 SCMR 319
Claims Commissioner working under Articles 193, 196, 228 and 471 Claims Commissioner (Registration of Claims Act 1956)…
- AMIN JUTE MILLS LTD. v. CHITTAGONG MUNICIPALITY 1969 SCMR 320
Article 62 and Rules of the Supreme Court, 1956, AXXVI, r 2 The delay in filing an application at the time of submitting the review is not required to be submitted with a certified copy of the court o…
- INCOME-TAX OFFICER, CENTRAL CIRCLE II, KARACHI v. CEMENT AGENCIES LTD 1969 PLD 322
Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Article 63 Supreme Court decision does not affect past and closed transactions, based on the verdict heard by judicial proceedings, is finally settled according to the ex…
- AHMAD NAWAZ v. MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, WEST PAKISTAN 1969 SCMR 323
The Article 98 review has no basis for interference under Article 98…
- SHAHKOT BUS SERVICE v. STATE 1969 SCMR 325
Article 616161 The inherent powers of the High Court are very broad and uncertain the High Court can give all such orders as can give real and concrete justice.…
- FAZALUR REHMAN v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 328
Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Section 498 High Court dismisses request for bail by submission order…
- ADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER v. S. ALI BAKHSH & SONS 1969 SCMR 330
Compensation book, issuance of fake person, after losing original, is entitled to receive duplicate book, if Memo No. 72?23 Comp Comp Reh, 59, date 16 11 11 11 59 is satisfied.…
- ANWAR HUSSAIN v. GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN 1969 SCMR 332
r 16 3 Police constables were charged with offenses under Sections 363 and 376, PPC but acquitted on suspicion and imprisonment 16 3 was not barred from conducting departmental inquiry.…
- HOME SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN, LAHORE v. JAN MUHAMMAD 1969 PLD 333
Section 3 and 25 Commissioner / Section 25 of the West Pakistan Criminal Law (Amendment) Act 1963 are considering the question of handing over the Tribunal / proceeding to the Commissioner, while also…
- BEER DIN v. THE SETTLEMENT 1969 SCMR 334
Article ??? Previous request between same party…
- FAHMIDA KAUSAR v. FARHAT 1969 SCMR 336
Application for special leave for Article 58 (3) appeal point was not raised in the court below, the appeal cannot be obtained for special leave.…
- MUSHTAQ AHMAD ALIAS MUSHTAQ HUSSAIN v. MST. HAKIM BIBI 1969 PLD 338
The Government Land (Punjab) 's Colonization Act of 1912 gives the widow the right to inherit her husband's property as the limited property may become the sole proprietorship of his proprietary right…
- DIRECTOR-GENERAL, BARRAGES PROJECT, WAPDA, LAHORE v. SHAMSUDDIN 1969 SCMR 338
In section 2 (1) (n) Schedule 11, item (ix) read with means and imports the expression overhead the electric line wide, an electrician, as described in Section 2 (1) to the electrical wires from the w…
- ASHIQ HUSSAIN v. NISAR ALI 1969 SCMR 341
Section 115 certiorari, arguments by the prosecution, did not prove much in the execution of this document and in the presence of the testimony that the testimony of the witness was not bound by the t…
- SAKINA BIBI v. REVENUE ASSISTANT 1969 SCMR 342
Article 58 (3) appeal for special leave for appeal point is not brought down which cannot be emphasized…
- JAN MUHAMMAD v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 344
Sections 34 and 302 jointly charged with murder with b…
- JAMIL AHMAD v. THE STATE 1969 PLD 344
Special Areas (Restoration of Jurisdiction) Order 1961 Arts 98, 19, 223 (5), 242 and 225 and Special Areas (Restoration of Jurisdiction) Order (III of 1961) do not fall into the jurisdiction of the Su…
- MESSRS SHIRKAT-I-AHBAB v. NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN 1969 PLD 349
Order of the Civil Procedure Code Order XXXVIII, rr 5, 6 & 9 and O XLIII, r 1 (Q), before the judicial proceeding, in the case of attachment, attachment before the court, The court is satisfied that t…
- IMAM BAKHSH v. MUHAMMAD YAQJB 1969 PCRLJ 354
Criminal Procedure, Evidence against PPC under Sections 420 and 406, taking into account the criminal code of conduct (CCPC) Section A 561 AG dishonoring G and dishonoring F against F. In the absence …
- BUTA v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 354
The presence of the accused at Sections 5 325 and 6 326 is not a mere confirmation of the prosecution's statement that he participated in attacking the injured person.…
- MUHAMMAD ZIKARIYA alias PAPU v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 356
The bail suspect was detained and not presented for 6 months after the invoice failed to appear.…
- MUHAMMAD ISMAIL v. KHUSHI MUHAMMAD 1969 PCRLJ 357
Special leave to appeal against the verdict in the murder of Constitution Pakistan 1962 Article 58 (3) and Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), section 497 (2), appeal against the pending accused That …
- HAQ NAWAZ v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 358
The Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Article 58 (3) and Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), Section 497 does not make unnecessary interference in matters of bail, for the first time to be charged with inquirin…
- MAZHAR HUSSAIN v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 360
Section 421 No complex law or factual question that justifies appellate court summary dismissal…
- RASHIID AHMAD v. THE STATE 1969 PLD 362
The Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Article 58 (2) (b) expression sentenced the construction High Court to death sentence for transporting life imprisonment. : Appeal not eligible (Hamood ur Rehman, unl…
- FAZLE MALIK v. STATE 1969 SCMR 364
Sections 302 and 304 of the existence of the tomb and the charge of sudden provocation changed from section 302 to section 304…
- IKRAMULLAH v. STATE 1969 SCMR 369
Section 2 (3) and the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), the conduct of section 228, referred to in person, falls under the purview of section 228, the PPC High Court has no jurisdiction to proceed in con…
- DR. AHMAD GHULAM MUHAMMAD, CIVIL SURGEON, CIVIL HOSPITAL, LYALLPUR v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 370
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 476 whether the jurisdiction under section 476 is properly exercised by the High Court if special leave of appeal is considered by the Supreme Court in the cas…
- MUHAMMAD ALI v. STATE 1969 SCMR 372
Sections 161 and 65 can impose fines of more than 9 months…
- GIASUDDIN v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 374
Long delay in filing a complaint and missing the complainant at the time of cross-examination of Articles 6 406 and 202020…
- SOHAVI v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 375
Section 300, Exception 1 is applicable only when serious and sudden provocation deprives itself of control over the accused with heavy weapons and murders along with several others seeking revenge for…
- MUHAMMAD BACHAL v. STATE 1969 SCMR 379
Section I Illegal Trespassing There is no evidence that the accused had even touched the bribe money or that it had been conveyed to him, only the complainant's proof of self-payment and his own testi…
- GHULAM MUHAMMAD v. STATE 1969 SCMR 382
Sections 302 and 304, Part II, the special leave of appeal by the Supreme Court, to consider whether the sentencing judge could proceed with the view that the offense committed was murder and, therefo…
- MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. STATE 1969 SCMR 383
Section 302 and Evidence Act I of 1872), Section 8 is a fugitive relationship between the complainant and the accused in any case…
- KHUDA BUX v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 390
Section 164 is a false statement which identifies the offense in which the offense is confessed and the person committing the confession is a police confession, return, irrelevant evidence act (I 1872…
- WORKS CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY v. THE KARACHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KARACHI 1969 PLD 391
Karachi Development Authority Order 1957 reads with Arts 4, 50 and 51 Karachi Development Authority (Amendment) Order (6 of 1962). Notification Approval Scheme issued by the Provincial Government, com…
- ALI v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 395
A section 556 judge of the High Court, without hearing the arguments on the issue of eligibility, preferred the appeal against the sentence, ordered the trial again, sentenced the accused and appealed…
- GHULAM MUHAMMAD v. MUHAMMAD SHARIF 1969 PLD 398
Criminal Procedure Code (CR PC) S 417 reserves the right to appeal both the facts of the case and the denial of the High Court on the ground that the order can be interfered with to interfere with the…
- LAL DIN v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 401
The joint purpose of Sections 302/149 and 326/149, comprising six accused, was neither possible to cause death nor could they be known to death. The result is that all the accused are matched except o…
- ABDUL RASHID v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 403
Article 300 murder except the crime of murder is exempted under the exception of someone but the exception is on the person who relies on it, Section 300 another, the exception woman, She was divorced…
- STEEL BROTHERS & CO. LTD., LONDON v. CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS 1969 PTD 403
Referral Request for High Court Section 66 of Income Tax Act 1922 The question raised before treating the High Court on the same question is a reference request, cannot be asked under Article 98, Cons…
- SHER ALI v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 405
Sections 300 and 302 intend to kill A, and instead cause B's death, however, he has been convicted of murder.…
- PAKISTAN, THROUGH THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE v. MUHAMMAD HIMAYATULLAH FARUKHI 1969 PLD 407
The principle of folk potency (the power to take a decisive step) is available to the government or the relevant authority who is entitled to reject the order. It cannot be withdrawn or Ed cannot be r…
- MUNJAWAR v. STATE 1969 SCMR 407
A 105-year-old man is alleged to have shot his friend and the accident proves that the deceased was killed by accident. , Sections 302 and 304A…
- N. MANAK JI v. FAKHAR IQBAL 1969 PCRLJ 411
Withholding criminal proceedings pending by the Civil Suits High Court, capable of issuing an order under Section 1 to 1 under the Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC), however, on the facts of each case u…
- SAWAR KHAN v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 415
Sentenced under section 302 of the Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Article 53 (3), the PPC High Court, while accepting the appeal, denying bail, requested special leave against the order denying the Sup…
- H. M. NASEER ARABIAN v. STATE 1969 SCMR 416
Article 2 (i) Article ill paper which states that the magistrate was likely to influence and associate himself with one of the parties in the matter pending before him, writing tendency, holding, cont…
- ALI KHAN v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 418
Section 1 421 Whether the record is sought for the authenticity of the Court of Appeal or not, there is no complicated question of fact or law arising and decision which has not been appealed from rep…
- MUHAMMAD SADIQ v. THE STATE 1969 PLD 418
The Homeless Persons (Land Settlement) Act 1958 reads with sections 27 and 29 homeless persons (Land Settlement) Rules, even though the sanction of prosecution under Section 9 Section 27 does not requ…
- MIR DAD v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 419
Section 149 has been divided into two sections, which are constituted by the member of the Legislative Assembly for legal proceedings against the common purpose of the Assembly. The question of knowle…
- THE STATE v. SHAH SAWAR 1969 PCRLJ 422
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 496 Bail Pending Appeals Any general rule that has not been charged has the right to extend bail during the hearing of the appeal against conviction in a guaran…
- MUHAMMAD SARWAR v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 423
The Prevention of Corruption Act 1947 Section 5 (2) raises the happiness of the accused to raiding the accused magistrate, whether to implement the provisions of Section 164, CCPC in recording the acc…
- ABDUL GHAFOOR v. AHMAD KUNHI 1969 PLD 424
The Constitution of Pakistan 1962, Article 58 (3), will be appealed to the special court again to consider whether section 13 (6) applies to the provisions of the Ordinance 1959 prohibiting the rent o…
- MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 426
The section 302 sentence is based on the evidence of a single witness to tell the medical witness's death immediately, but when the eye witness has suffered a heart attack, the deceased called his att…
- M. MUHAMMAD ZAKARIA & CO. v. PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTAN 1969 SCMR 428
Article 56 Frustration, Depression The idea of frustration is not tarred by the government's purchase of legitimate export permits for export of goods to foreign countries, but instead of terminating …
- WORKS CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY v. THE KARACHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 1969 PLD 430
The constitution, which termed the rights of the Pakistan 1962 Article 64 Court of Court, cannot be abolished by executive action. Cannot depart directions from quote. As it remains intact, the provin…
- MUHAMMAD ARIF v. MUHAMMAD KAWSHAIR ALI 1969 PLD 435
Section 5 of the East Pakistan Muslim Family Law Rules 1961 reads under Ordinance VIII of the East Pakistan Muslim Family Laws, 1961, r 7 and the Regulatory Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 467/34 and 21 …
- AHMAD KHAN v. SAKINA BI 1969 SCMR 435
S / 13 Rent Demand According to the municipal assessment, the tenant cannot refuse to pay the rent simply because he preferred the appeal against the assessment made by the municipality.…
- SHAMSHER v. THE STATE 1969 PCRLJ 443
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Sections 408 and 439 (6) Appeal pending in the Sessions Court against the Magistrate's order Appeal of the offender before the Sessions Court is correct. do not have…
- PRESENT : HAMOODUR RAHMAN, C. J., MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI, SAJJAD AHMAD v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, KARACHI 1969 PLD 446
The customs authorities' decision to seize and seize goods from them and to seize and fine them as per customs act 1878 section 167 (8a), (81) section 212 is in the nature of a jurisdiction to seize g…
- BARKAT ALI v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 448
Section 8 app8 Allowing for Extra Evidence at the Appeal Stage…
- FATOOMAL v. REHABILITATION. COMMISSIONER, KHAIRPUR DIVISION 1969 PLD 452
Pakistan Rehabilitation Ordinance 1948 Pakistan (Associal Property Protection) Ordinance (XVIII of 1948), Pakistan (IQQ Property of 1946) Ordinance (Rehabilitation Settlement Scheme, Landless Settleme…
- HASSAN v. STATE 1969 SCMR 454
Under the alleged 34 section, the presence of the accused is sufficient or the crime cannot be proved, except that there is evidence of some degree of action by each accused besides the common intenti…
- MUGHAL KHAN NOOR v. STATE 1969 SCMR 457
Section 5 (2) of the Supreme Court Panel Code (XLV of 1860), section 161, based on the definition of evidence appealed to the Supreme Court against conviction and not in any way…
- STATE v. GOHAR REHMAN 1969 SCMR 460
Arts 170, 4 and 5 and Rules (in succession) Order (I 1958), Article 2 (7) violate the fundamental right of the applicants to proceed with the cancellation of the constitution pending a pre-requisite w…
- SALEH MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE 1969 PLD 461
Maritime Customs Act 1878 section 167 (81) and the Import and Export (Control) Act (1950 XXXX of 1950), sections 3 and 6, which were found in the possession of smuggled Indian fleet addresses, and An …
- MD. SONAFAR ALI v. STATE 1969 SCMR 461
Section 2 342 Every evidence and every person who has a criminal effect against it should be prosecuted while under section 2 342 it should be examined but the immoral nature of its examination should…
- ANGBATS AKTIEBOLAGET BOHUSLANSKA KUSTEN, SWEDEN v. CENTRAL HARDWARE STORES, CHITTAGONG 1969 PLD 463
The special leave to appeal by the Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Article 58 (3) was allowed to consider these points: (i) Since the agreement was directly between the principal and the other party, th…
- SHAMSUL HAQUE NO. II v. STATE 1969 SCMR 466
Section 411 accused momentarily saw the stolen property in the bag and dumped it in a rickshaw, in which the bag owner allegedly committed another theft. There is no indication that the suspect was aw…
- QURBAN ALI v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 467
Sections 201 and 218 are necessarily aware that belief and intention have not been ensured…
- ZAHUR-UD-DIN v. STATE 1969 SCMR 469
[As amended by the Criminal Law Amendment Act (XXXVII of 1953]], a substantial amount of Section 4 (S) evidence has been recorded in the 11 11 Magistrate First Class, followed by 17 11 53 evidence by …
- SAFDAR HUSSAIN v. STATE 1969 SCMR 476
Section 394 Prosecution for separation of a single accused from a separate act of conspiracy, clear action, conduct or other circumstances to secure the conviction of another accused in the crime…
- MBSSRS BENGAL FRIENDS & CO v. MESSRS GOUR BENODE SARA & CO., CALCUTTA 1969 PLD 477
Trademarks Act 1940 Arts 223 and 242 and Constitution of Pakistan (1956), Arts I (2) and 104 Tribal Areas Analyze, administer and legislate various constitutional provisions relating to the constituti…
- SEKANDAR BAYATI v. CROWN 1969 SCMR 477
Section 396 The Duty of the Acceptor Statement By credible evidence that the accused had gathered at the meeting and were seen at a stage of their journey where the robbery took place and also when th…
- ZILLE HASNAIN v. STATE 1969 SCMR 481
Section 5 (2 ?? Public employee misconduct by unlawful or fraudulent use of property by corruption, punished under section no. Bar, however, charged under Section 409, PPC Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Se…
- MUSHTAQ MUHAMMAD KHAN v. STATE 1969 SCMR 484
[As amended by the Criminal Law Amendment Act (seriously amended 1953 of 1953]], Section 4 (3) (4) and (S)) before the General Magistrate without trial after 17 11 53 Evidence of any litigation may be…
Other years — Supreme Court
2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1983 · 1982 · 1981 · 1980 · 1979 · 1978 · 1977 · 1976 · 1975 · 1974 · 1973 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1967 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1962 · 1961 · 1960 · 1959 · 1958 · 1957
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.