Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

IQBAL AHMAD versus THE STATE


Appellants of Criminal Code (CCPC) Sections 416 and 498 bail were found to be equipped with a rifle and a complainant who was targeted by appellant B&C, the accused of the bullet company in which the shotguns were fired. The High Court, which granted bail, did not injure the bullets. On B&C but refusing to grant bail, rest on point of discrimination

1968 P Cr. L J 428

[Supreme Court]

Present: A. R. Cornelius, C. J. and Muhammad Yaqub Ali, J

SALEEM KHAN‑Petitioner

versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 291 of 1967, decided on 6th December 1967.

(On appeal from the order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore, dated the 9th October 1967, in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1 of 1967/Criminal Revision No. 1065 of 1967).

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)-----

---

Ss. 416 & 498‑Bail --Accused appellant A found armed with rifle and complainant found struck by bullet‑Co‑accused appellants B & C found to have carried shot guns but no injury caused by pellets suffered by complainant‑High Court granting bail to B & C but refusing to A‑Refusal to grant bail, held, rested on a point of distinction.

S. Wajid Hussain, Senior Attorney Supreme Court for Petitioner.

Nemo for the State.

Date of hearing: 6th December 1967

ORDER

MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI, J

.‑The petitioner stands convicted under section 307/34, P. P. C. and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for four years. The High Court while admitting the revision petition filed against conviction and sentence has refused bail to him, but allowed bail to two of his co‑accused.

It is urged that there was no apparent ground to distinguish between the case of the petitioner and the co‑accused who have been granted bail. The petitioner alone was armed with a rifle and the complainant was found to have been struck by a bullet. The other two accused carried shot guns, but no injury caused by pellets was suffered by the complainant. There was thus a point of distinction on which the refusal to grant bail to the petitioner rests.

The petition for leave to appeal is dismissed. .

Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates email from Ambela lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.