Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD SHARIF ALIAS SHARIFI versus THE STATE


The one-day ban was delayed because of the delay in the ban because it merely praised the evidence in the petitions as the death sentence involved in the case.

1968 P Cr. L J 216

[Supreme Court]

Present: S. A. Rahman and Fazle‑Akbar, JJ

MUHAMMAD DAUD‑Petitioner

versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 264 of 1967, decided on 11th October 1967.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Peshawar Bench, dated the 21st August 1967, in Criminal Appeal No. 38 of 1967).

Murder

------

---‑‑Conviction‑Petition barred by one day‑Delay condoned as case involved capital sentence‑Points raised in petition merely going to appreciation of evidence‑No miscarriage of justice by ignoring legal requirements in appreciation of evidence shown‑Petition dismissed‑Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Art. 58(3).

Muhammad Akram Raja, Advocate Supreme Court, instructed by Salim Ahmad Malik, Attorney for Petitioner.

Nemo for the State.

Date of hearing: 11th October 1967.

JUDGMENT

S. A. RAHMAN, J.‑

The petition is barred by one day, but as the case involves the capital sentence, we condone the delay.

We have heard Mr. Muhammad Akram Raja, in support of the petition for special leave. The High Court has upheld the conviction of the petitioner on a murder charge and confirmed his sentence of death. The points raised by Raja Muhammad Akram merely go to the appreciation of the evidence on which the conviction rests. This Court normally does not undertake to re‑appraise the evidence which has been accepted by the courts below, unless it is shown that there has been a miscarriage of justice by ignoring some legal requirements in the appreciation of evidence. No such case has been made out in the petition which is dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Kharan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.