Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD ANWAR versus THE STATE


Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Article 62 Review Points Appealed in Support of the Court's Factual Requests When a previous application was considered, no new point was settled, no case for review, was held, and Request dismissed

1968 P Cr. L J 407

[Supreme Court]

Present: S. A. Rahman and Hamoodur Rahman, JJ

ABDUL HAMID‑Petitioner

versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Criminal Review Petition No. 11 of 1967, decided on 20th December 1967.

(In the matter of review of this Court order dated the 22nd June, 1967 in Criminal Petition No. 141 of 1967).

Constitution of Pakistan (1962)-----

---

Art. 62‑Review‑Points urged in support of petition relating to facts present to mind of Court when previous petition disposed of‑No fresh point arising for con sideration ‑ No case for review, held, made out and petition dismissed.

Muhammad Ashfaq Khan, Senior Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Wali Muhammad Khawaja, Senior Attorney for Petitioner.

Nemo for the State.

Date of hearing : 20th December 1967.

JUDGMENT

S. A. RAHMAN, J.

‑The petitioner Abdul Hamid sought special leave to appeal from this Court from the order of a learn ed Single Judge of the High Court of West Pakistan by which the transfer of four cases pending against him under sections 406 and 420 of the Pakistan Penal Code, from the Court of the Additional District Magistrate, Muzaffargarh, was refused. His petition for special leave to appeal was dismissed by a Bench of this Court by order dated the 22nd June 1967. 'Abdul Hamid seeks review of this Court's order.

The points urged by Rao Muhammad Ashfaq Khan in support of this petition relate to facts which were present to the minds of the learned Judges of this Court when the petition for special leave to appeal was disposed of. No fresh point arise for consideration such as would justify review of the previous, order of this Court. The only point urged by .the learned counsel is that if one case had been transferred from the Court of the Additional District Magistrate at the petitioner's request, the other four cases should have been treated similarly. This position obtained even at the time of the previous order.

No case for review has been made out and we dismiss the petition.

Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top civil advocates from Muzaffargarh lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.