MST. FAREEDA AHMED BAIG versus BAYER PAKISTAN (PVT.) LIMITED
Section 25 (8) (g) National Industrial Relations Commission (Procedures and Functions) Regulations, 1973, Regulation 32 (2) (c) Application by the employer for the exercise of unfair labor and stay application Notice was issued after the employee was absent from duty and charged the applicant, a retaliatory action was initiated against the applicant and it was alleged that he was accused of trade union activities. Is being targeted because of And that the employers had decided to expel him from the job which was the result of unfair labor practices by the employers. The employers had earlier prepared copies of the showcase notices and warning letters which showed that Employers had no ill will against the employee. Charge sheet on allegations of corruption, were investigated against. And according to the inquiry report, she was found guilty and the employer had to take disciplinary action against her National Industrial Relations Commission; there was no jurisdiction to intervene in the disciplinary proceedings, the employee filed a petition, not a qualified employee. Had set up an unfair practice case against employers, his plea and stay application were dismissed
Related judgments — National Industrial Relations Commission, 2011
