MOULA BUKHSH versus INTERNATIONAL BISCUITS LIMITED THROUGH MANAGER/OCCUPIER
Sections 25 (8) (g) and 17 National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulations and Duties) Regulations, 1973, Regular 32 (2) (c) Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section O11 The petitioner (applicant) against the termination of the stack application by an unfair employee alleges that his services were terminated because he refused to accept the resignation job and the Golden Handshake employer Filed a request to accept the offer for financial reasons. Establishment, which was accepted by the Labor Court in directing the applicants to pay all legal liabilities after their account was settled at the time of payment of outstanding dues and their objections to payment of other benefits. Was not raised. His dismissal and reinstatement from him and the service petitioner's lawyer claimed that the applicants were entitled to be reinstated in the job because their dismissal order was declared illegal, not just the Labor Court's. The source, but also the Supreme Courts, did not maintain stability in the case that the dismissal order was declared illegal, but it was impossible to restore applicants to the service, as not only the entire establishment of employers was closed. But all the assets as well as all the assets were sold by the employers, the establishment did not exist and The owners filed detailed reasons for the petition filed under Standing Order 11A. Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968, which voluntarily relocated to the Labor Court
Related judgments — National Industrial Relations Commission, 2011
