KESC LABOUR UNION (CBA) THROUGH CHAIRMAN versus KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LTD. THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Sections 25 (8) (g), 17 (e), (f), 26 (3) (b) and 50 National Industrial Relations Commission (Procedures and Duties) Regulations, 1973, Reg. 32 (2) (c) In practice, the applicant (Employees Union) alleged that the employer / establishment intended to move the workers to another created `business office region 'where, in fact, no one was paid. There were no jobs or jobs and no practical activities to perform. On behalf of the workers and they said that this process of establishment was not only illegal, illegal act, but it was unfair labor and also contemptible in nature, in this case the employer and the establishment wanted to be better. Some of the schemes in the interests of how the employees' union imagined that during the transfer of union workers, the administration would keep them in additional pools. And then they would be removed from the job did not know that the establishment was already running at a loss and that the employers had introduced the Business Office Region of Scheme for improvement, as well as finalizing the performance standards. Purpose set. At the time of the parties and the signing of the agreement, the applicant union had also morally agreed to withdraw all pending cases filed against the employer, which is why the applicant union had to return the petition. There was no right to further action on this request for a pass. Union \ r \ n
Related judgments — National Industrial Relations Commission, 2011
