SARBULAND KHAN versus TRUSTEES OF PORT OF KARACHI THROUGH CHAIRMAN
Section 22A (8) (g) of unfair practice by employers The applicant / employee born on the wrong date of employee's retirement alleges that management was against him due to his affiliation with the trade union and a Was trying to victimize her. Or another pretext applicant further alleged that the administration served her with a notice of retirement on the date of birth on her wrong date, which was an unfair labor practice to join her service. At the time, the applicant's date of birth was recorded as 7 1950, and the certificate obtained that he was confirmed to be retired on 8 7 2010, when he was convicted, who claimed that His date of birth was 13 8 1957, he did not produce any document as per the evidence. Despite his claim that the applicant had never submitted this document during his full term of employment, even after attaining academic qualification. He was awakened from deep sleep only after his retirement notice was served and claimed that his date of birth was 13 8 1957 and not 8 service 1950 once the date entered at the service was to remain dead; and No change in the date of birth was allowed thereafter, applications were dismissed under section 28A (8) (g) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, in the circumstances
Related judgments — National Industrial Relations Commission, 2011
