Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

GHULAM HAIDER versus SHEEDA


Pakistan Penal Code Section 301 Appeal by the Sanitary High Court to reduce the death sentence from death sentence to transportation, which is the view of the High Court that the responsibility of the accused has been reduced. Understand. Appeal for special leave rejected in appeal to Supreme Court

1968 P Cr. L J 437

[Supreme Court]

Present: A. R. Cornelius, C. J. and Muhammad Yaqub Ali, J

Mst. HAFIZAN‑Petitioner

versus

WALI MUHAILMAD AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 288 of 1967, decided on 6th December 1967.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore, dated the 25th September 1967, in Criminal Appeal No. 549 of 1966).

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)------

-----

S. 301‑Murder‑Senteree‑High Court on appeal reducing sentence of accused from death to trans portation for life on ground that he was subject to frequent relapses of schizophrenia‑View of High Court that responsibility of accused for murder was diminished, held, to be correct‑Petition for special leave to appeal to Supreme Court dismissed.

Muhammad Nadir Malik, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Abdul Karim Sheikh, Attorney for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing: 6th December 1967.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI, J.

‑The petitioner calls in question the order of the High Court reducing the sentence of death awarded to Wali Muhammad, respondent, under section 302, P. P. C. for the murder of his brother's wife to transportation for life.

The defence evidence disclosed that a year before the occurrence the respondent had suffered from schizophrenia and was admitted for treatment to the Government Mental Hospital, Lahore. Mr. Mohammad Rashid Chowdhury, Medical Super intendent, deposed that there were frequent relapses of the schizophrenia from which the respondent suffered although he was certified to be fit when discharged from the hospital.

The view taken by the High Court that the responsibility of the respondent for murder was diminished is plainly correct.

The petition for leave to appeal is dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocates from Kurram Agency lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.