Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GULZAR versus THE STATE


Under Section 80 Code 4, 2020 and 8 468 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Section 7 bail7 denied bail, PPC has a reasonable basis for questioning whether it was a crime. For which he is punishable with transportation for life. The court
1968 P Cr. L J 1681

[Supreme Court]

Present: S. A. Rahman, C. J., Fazal-e-Akbar, Muhammad Yaqub Ali and Sajjad Ahmad, JJ

NIZAM DIN-Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE-Respondent

Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 11-1 of 1968, decided on 19th April 1968.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore, dated the 21st March 1968, in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 5359 of 1967).

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898),

S. 497-Person charged with offences under Ss. 380, 420 & 468, P. P. C. refused bail-Question whether there were reasonable grounds for believing that he was guilty of offence punishable with transportation for life ----Special leave to appeal granted by Supreme Court.

Gul Muhammad Khan, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Tanvir Ahmad, Attorney for Petitioner.

Ghulam Mohyuddin, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Abdul Karim, Attorney for the State.

Date of hearing: 19th April 1968.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI, J.--

The petitioner is charged with the commission of offences under sections 380, 381, 420, 467 and 468, P. P. C. The other co-accused have been granted bail, but the case of the petitioner has been distinguished by the Courts below on the ground that he alone stands to benefit by the removal of certain documents from the judicial file of the Senior Civil Judge, Gujranwala, and their substitution by fabricated documents.

The petitioner has been in custody for more than six months while the investigation is being conducted by the C. I. A. No evidence has been so far collected by the Investigating agency which tends to connect the petitioner directly with the aforesaid offences. It is also by no means established at this stage that he was likely to benefit by the disappearance of the documents in question. On the contrary it is pointed out that it was the petitioner who first moved the Senior Civil Judge regarding the disappearance of those documents. A question, therefore, arises whether reasonable grounds appear within section 497, Cr. P. C., for believing that the petitioner has been guilty of an offence punishable with transportation for life.

Leave to appeal is granted. Interim bail is allowed- to the satisfaction of the Additional District Magistrate, Gujranwala.

Leave granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law websites from Rajanpur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.