Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NOOR SAMAND versus THE STATE


The Constitution of Pakistan 1962 Article 5 (3) Section 307, PPC question includes only one of the definitions of evidence. The special leave of appeal was rejected by the Supreme Court

1968 P Cr. L J 1672

[Supreme Court]

Present: Fazal-e-Akbar and Hamoodur Rahman, JJ

GHULAM RASOOL AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners

Versus

Tree STATE‑Respondent

Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 85 of 1968, decided on 30th May 1968.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Karachi. Bench, Karachi, dated the 2nd February 1968, in Criminal Appeal No. 360 of 1965).

Constitution of Pakistan (1962),

Art. 5(3)‑--Conviction under S. 307, P. P. C.‑‑Question involved being one of mere appreciation of evidence‑--Special leave to appeal declined by Supreme Court.

M. B. Zaman, Senior Advocate Supreme Court (Shaukat All, Advocate Supreme Court with him) instructed by Khalilur Rahman, Attorney for Petitioners.

Nemo for the State.

Date of hearing: 30th May 1968.

JUDGMENT

FAZAL-E-AKBAR, J.‑

The petitioners Ghulam Rasool and Bashir Ahmad stand convicted under section 307/34 of the Pakistan Penal Code and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for three years each. Their convictions rest on the evidence of Wali Muhammad (P. W. 1), who was target of the shot, and Mst. Emna (P. W. 2), who was inmate of the house. The Courts below have, for good and sufficient reasons, accepted their evidence. The points raised by the learned counsel merely go to the appreciation of the evidence. Following our usual practice we decline to re‑examine the evidence for the third time in the absence of any illegality of procedure or violation of any principle in appreciation of evidence.

This petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

Leave refused.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate for immigration from Sakardu lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.