SINGER PAKISTAN LIMITED THROUGH DIRECTOR PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATION versus SINGER INDUSTRIES LABOUR UNION
Sections 49 (4) (e) and 64 National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulations and Duties) Regulations, 1973, Regulation 32 (2) (c) Applicant Wages Against Interim Prohibited Order Affirmed Applicants / Employers They claimed on request. Under section 49 (4) (e) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002, during the reconciliation process, committing unfair labor practices to force the union and its officials to pressurize the administration and accept their demands. started doing it. Employees displayed banners outside the factory, accusing some of the administration. The actions in the affairs of the employees were in violation of Sections 64 (1) (d) and (f) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 2002, which was an unfair practice practice with the employees. Prayed for dealing with employees and requested restriction on display of banners, play cards, posters, wall chalking, etc. near FA. The Ketatri and Head Office and the Commission should also approve a banning order banning the union and its workers from banning slogans, demonstrations and measures to pressure the administration to approve their demands when employed. Was resorting to unfair practice practices. The contractual issue was already pending in this area, after which there was no justification for banners which would equate to pressure from the administration to approve their demands, in which employers prohibited relief. Made a first case for The order approved by the Bench of Commission was confirmed, in the circumstances and the parties were instructed to submit their evidence
Related judgments — National Industrial Relations Commission, 2009
