Find a Lawyer

LUCKY TEXTILE MILLS BAHBOOD MAZDOOR UNION, KARACHI THROUGH PRESIDENT AND GENERAL SECRETARY versus LUCKY TEXTILE MILLS

Section 25 (8) (e) Determination of the powers of the collective bargaining unit of the National Industrial Relations Commission, through the Applicants' Union Commission The council had a collective bargaining unit for. The petition was fully supported by the Council for the applicants that the Establishment had business in Sindh and the NWFP and no local union or industry-equipped trade union was registered for the Establishment except the applicant's employer. There were five textile units in Sindh and one in the NWFP. To protect the interests of the employees, it was necessary, fair and feasible that the entire establishment of employers in Sindh and NWFP had the same terms and conditions of employment; Was declared. Industrial Relations Act, 2008 \ r \ n

Related judgments — National Industrial Relations Commission, 2009

• MUHAMMAD RIZWAN v. CHINA YUNCHENG PLATE MAKING CO. (PVT) LTD. through Notified Manager 2009 PLC 358
• KHALID PERVEZ SH. v. ARIF KHAN 2009 PLC 369
• FALAK NAZ v. HERTZ OPTIMUS LIMITED 2009 PLC 375
• ABDUL AZIZ BALOCH v. ADAMJEE INSURANCECOMPANY LTD. 2009 PLC 378
• LIAQUAT ALI v. MANAGING DIRECTOR, SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LTD. 2009 PLC 79
• MAQSOOD IQBAL v. S. N. G. P. L. 2009 PLC 87
• SINGER PAKISTAN LIMITED through Director Personnel and Administration v. SINGER INDUSTRIES LABOUR UNION 2009 PLC 232
• K.E.S.C. DEMOCRATIC MAZDOOR UNION through General Secretary v. K.E.S.C. through CEO 2009 PLC 241

All National Industrial Relations Commission judgments of 2009 →

advocate from Hattian lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes