HABIB BANK EMPLOYEES\' FEDERATION THROUGH SENIOR VICE-PRESIDENT versus HABIB BANK LTD. THROUGH PRESIDENT
Section 49 (4) (e) Applicability of unfair practice through employment of the National Industrial Relations Commission (Procedures and Functions) Regulations, 1973, Reg. 32 (2) (c) to verify applicant / employees / federation Was rated The status quo applied for a certified application, suggesting that the counsel for the applicants was to advise that certain steps were taken and taken by the administration, which were "unfair labor practices" and that Had argued that a one-window operation was introduced. The administration which was also unfair labor practice as it was intended to crush applicants only for applicants \ Federation / Applicant has requested that the justice status given to the applicants \ order be confirmed for justice and equity. Be made for administration / bank for council. On the other hand, it was claimed that the assignment of duty and employment arrangements is a special arrangement, therefore, the collective bargaining agent has no rights. Whatever management issues were to be interfered with and the introduction of the OneWindow process, the administration had the right to provide employees with the skills needed to meet the new emerging technical realities. In support of his point of view, the action and record presented by him was noteworthy, while for the applicant / federation the lawyer was not exempt, while the record presented by the applicant's lawyer differed from the facts of the case. Was. The first occurrence of unfair labor practice and the other two essential elements, such as convenience and disadvantage and irreparable harm / injury.
Related judgments — National Industrial Relations Commission, 2009
