Section (49 (e) (e) unfair practice of employers / employees on the job guaranteed an impermissible order in their application under which the respondents were promoted, while they were ignored.) There is no credible evidence that the petitioner alleged that he was neglected because of his legal trade union activities. The impression was that the applicant was a trade unionist, such as his trade. The union's activities angered employers so much that they were out and about to keep it out of development, and neither did its trade union Was presented to an official confirming their trade union activities, nor did they themselves prove any such exercise through trade union activities, which could justify their claim that these trade unions They were ignored because of the activities, the record on evidence established that the applicant was not an active trade unionist and that his activities, such as those that had no basis for neglect, The Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002 was not supplied to the General Assembly. The National Industrial Relations Commission has been asked to enjoy all types of complaints requests, even though they may not be related to unfair labor practices, but because of its trade union activities, a worker may be abused. I can interfere. After being subjected to the activities of his trade union, it was not enough for him to be involved in any such trade union activities as the applicants neglected the employees.
Related judgments — National Industrial Relations Commission, 2009
