MUSSALI KHAN versus KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. LTD.
[As survived by the Industrial Relations (Rehabilitation and Amendment Act (XV of 2010)]], Section 25 of the National Industrial Relations Commission (Procedures and Duties) Regulations, 1973, Reg. 32 (2) (c) The applicant / employee challenged the employer's letter for the determination of the date of the proper wage, the application for interim stay, under which the applicant was told that he was destined to retire as of retirement on 30 pe 2010. When he was an active member of the Labor Union in the Establishment, he would resign from the applicant's request. An interim order was issued in Q which mentioned his birth date in his application for employment and stated that he was male. In the pre-medical examination, the same year the births revealed on the record also indicate that in the year of the applicant's own service, the administration has respected the date of birth on record. Silence, even when it was shown to him that he had come to know about this fact in August 2010. But he returned to the commission after a two-month letter of his retirement, after which the element of unfair labor practice, which was irrational for the exercise of jurisdiction of the National Industrial Relations Commission, was lost in this case, petitioner. The petition filed by was not a qualified hearing applicant. After the employer fails to establish a case of inappropriate wages, their stay request and application
Related judgments — National Industrial Relations Commission, 2011
