KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION LABOUR UNION versus KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED
Sections 25, 17, 26 and 32 of the National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulations and Duties) Regulations, 1973, Regln 32 (2) (c) Application for unfair practice interim order Petitioner Union by employees, which collectively deals with Was a selling agent. The establishment had alleged that four employees, who were permanent workers who cast their votes in the previous referendum, were badly promoted as officers cadre, who were told that their employees Keep away from trade union activities, which is unfair. When employers filed a labor practice application, interim stay was ordered in favor of the applicants, it was stated that the employees were ordered to give publicity in the months of June and July, 2009 while the applicants Had filed an application against allegedly unfair labor practice. In the month of March, 2010, it was stated that the Commission of Applicants had already been affected by the Commission's Bench. In these circumstances, the promoter was not eligible to be given a contractual and legal right of employers and the employer had This type of administrative action cannot be barred from claiming that the unfair labor practice commission was authorized under Article 32 (2) of Regulation 32 of the National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulations and Functions). ) Regulation, 1973 states that for the prohibition of the aforesaid act / error commission, which constituted the unfair labor practice commission, such powers were not delegated to any unfair labor practice that was already in place. The clause is listed under Rule 32 (2) (c). Only attracted the National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulations and Duties) Regulations, 1973
Related judgments — National Industrial Relations Commission, 2011
