Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

HABIB AHMAD versus YAKOOB KHAN


Schedule, Part I premises have been divided into several units and each unit has been declared an independent house.

1969 S C M R 932

Present : A. R. Cornelius, C. J. and Fazle‑Akbar, J

Hafiz HABIB AHMAD‑Petitioner

versus

YAKOOB KHAN AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 229 of 1967, decided on 10th October 1967.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore, dated the 2nd March 1967, in Writ Petition No. 1994/R of 1963).

Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958)

---Sched., Part I‑Premises divided into several units and each unit declared to be an independent house‑Transferee of one such unit cannot lay claim to another unit.

Saeedur Rahman Khan, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Kamal Mustafa Bokhary, Attorney for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing :,l0th.October 1967.

JUDGMENT

FAZLE‑AKBAR, J.‑

In this case the dispute is with respect to eastern portion of House No. G/15, Railway Road, Ward No. 4, Muzaffargarh. The Settlement Department has divided this house into three portions and transferred them to different persons who were in possession of the same. Hafiz Hibib Ahmad, a transferee of one of the portions, filed a writ petition in the High Court, challenging the orders of the Settle ment authorities. The learned Judges of the High Court while dismissing the writ petition observed :‑

"Each portion has been declared by the Settlement Commis sioner to be self‑independent. The house which has been transferred to the petitioner constitutes a separate unit by itself. He has, therefore, no locus standi to get another house in the form of various portions which have been transferred to respondents Nos. 1 and 2,"

It cannot be said that the Settlement authorities acted beyond their jurisdiction in dividing the disputed house in separate units. Furthermore, as pointed out by the High Court, this petitioner was entitled to only one of those portions, which may be regarded as a separate house. In these circumstances, the High Court was justified in declining to interfere with the order of the Settlement authorities.

This petition is accordingly dismissed.

Leave refused.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocate from Kalar Syedian lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.