PAKISTAN MINERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (PMDC) HEAD OFFICE AND BRANCH OFFICE UNION versus PAKISTAN MINERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (PMDC)
Under Sections 33 (1) (9), 57 (2) (C) and 60 Law / Settlement Petitioner / Union under any guarantee guarantee or protection, the collective bargaining agent has made Section 33 (9). And 57 (2). (C) to discuss with the workers for promotion of the Industrial Relations Act, 2012, forbid the order permanently; and to represent the employer / corporation to prevent the appointment of officers from outside the applicant. Which requested a proposed appointment for cancellation of the ad. Has not exercised any right guaranteed or protected by any law under Section 39 (9) of the Industrial Relations Act, 2012. As a result of the settlement between the applicants union and the employer / corporation, 75% of the vacant posts were to be filled. Development, and through 25 direct direct recruitment, said that 75% of vacant vacancies were related to employees who were found fit to be selected by the Department's Publicity Committee to hold that position, which was the individual rights of the election workers, not The right of a collective bargaining agent. In the present case, the notice of complaint in connection with the complaint was given by the Collective Bargaining Agent, and not by any individual artisan, under the provisions of section 60 of the Industrial Relations Act, 2012, for any collective bargaining. The agent or any employer may apply to the Commission for enforcement. The labor is guaranteed by any law or collectively, by any law, award, settlement or decision, under section 33 (9) of section 33 of the Industrial Relations Act, 2012 The provisions are profitable, since
Related judgments — National Industrial Relations Commission, 2014
