HABIB BANK WORKERS\' FRONT OF PAKISTAN versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, DIRECTORATE OF LABOUR, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH
Applicants filed a joint bargaining unit of the Trade Union Sections 2 (XXI), 62 and 87 of all the bank's entities (employers) throughout the country in support of this claim as a collective bargaining unit. Some documents were requested to be identified. The union was registered with the National Industrial Relations Commission because, by industry, the entire establishment of Trade Union Bank was controlled and managed by one party. The balance sheet, the profit and loss of the entire establishment of the bank was the same as running its business all over Pakistan. After the head office of Karachi Bank, it had more than 1,400 branches in all four provinces as well as Islamabad Capital Territory Bank. ? In the circumstances, the terms of section 2 (xxxii) of the Industrial Relations Act, 2012 were against the spirit of the Trans Provincial Establishment, the registration of bank unions at the provincial level, the illegal and industrial relations act, 2012. After the Legislature of the Industrial Relations Act, 2012, when there was no law for the concept of \ Trans provincial \ Establishment, its effect in terms of section 8787 is enormous. At the provincial level, unions were barred from avoiding imbalances in the terms and conditions of employment. There cannot be more than one collective bargaining agent in the Establishment or Establishment Group on the basis of National Industrial Commission certification, based on the National Industrial Commission Certificate, based on the transfer of workers' services under the law and permanent decisions of the High Courts. ; And the Certificate of Collective Bargaining Agent, which is registered by the Provincial Registrar Trade Unions for the status of a Provincial Registered Trade Union.
Related judgments — National Industrial Relations Commission, 2014
