BAHRIA FOUNDATION NORTH ISLAMABAD versus CHAUDHRY ALI RANDHAWA
Order for payment of wages to the workers under Section 15 and 17 Industrial Relations Ordinance (V 2011), Wages Act, Section 57, 54, 56 and 58 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, to the National Industrial Relations Commission Rehabilitation Assistant Commissioner / Authority. Under the Salary Act, 1936, the Appellant Foundation was directed to pay a sum of Rs. 40,000. Took command of it. Which was rejected by the Labor Court, observing that on the basis of section 53 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 2011, all labor court functions and powers that have been assigned to the National Industrial Relations Commission were made by the Labor Court under section 58 of the Industrial Relations Act. Dismissed the appeal for validity The ordinance, 2011, will only lie against a full bench of the Commission against any award, judgment, or sentence or order passed by the Commission Bench, and will not appeal against the authority's order under the Payments Act, 1936. ? Section 17 of the Appeals for Payment of Wages Act, 1936, would not lie to the Commission, was to make the right of appeal, which could not have been in the presence of the Legislature, had not been reduced or obliged by the Commission on its own presence. Could have been done. To be kept before the Commission, the appellant was instructed to return, or his lawyer, the appellant, could take appropriate treatment as it could be acceptable under the law and the constitution.
Related judgments — National Industrial Relations Commission, 2014