Section 22A (8) (g) unfair labor practice by the applicants 'union of the employers, alleging that the employer / bank became enmity with applicants' union officials and members because of their legal trade union activities. Is. In order to be their victim, the officials were accused of being absent in addition. In presenting the charge sheet, some other actions were also identified, alleging that all of these acts of employers constitute unfair labor. And that employers resorted to intimidating and compelling applicant union officials to quit petitioner's trade union activities, praying that employers be banned from furthering unfair labor practices. Demand for rejection. The applicant's union was registered with the local registrar of trade unions, and the applications were filed under the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, when no collective bargaining unit was settled at the employer / bank. That the applicant's provincial status in the absence of a transfer, and the cancellation / cancellation of the union, did not apply to the provisions of the Industrial Relations Act, 2012, and the National Industrial Relations Commission, no jurisdiction to proceed on the matter. Had no choice. The union did not acquire the role of trade union according to the industry, the provisions of the Industrial Relations Act, 2012 did not apply. And the National Industrial Commission had no jurisdiction to decide on the petitions of the union which could not proceed, accordingly it was excluded.
Related judgments — National Industrial Relations Commission, 2014
