Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NABEEL versus ENGRO FOODS LIMITED

Section O12 Industrial Relations Act (X of 2012), Application for Request for Termination of Section 33 Service The territorial jurisdiction of the employees of the National Industrial Relations Commission who was appointed in Islamabad was terminated on the basis of His services were useless and surplus. No longer required to serve employees in Islamabad with a letter of suspension, the employees filed their complaints before the National Industrial Relations Commission Karachi Bench, which did not qualify as it had Islamabad endorsement in the Karachi Bench. The working employees had no jurisdiction to maintain the petitions before which they had no jurisdiction to file complaints, the applicant said, accordingly, they were also excluded.

Related judgments — National Industrial Relations Commission, 2014

• ABDUL WAHAB BALOCH v. UNITED BANK LMITED 2014 PLC 28
• PAKISTAN MINERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (PMDC) HEAD OFFICE AND BRANCH OFFICE UNION v. PAKISTAN MINERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (PMDC) 2014 PLC 56
• AGRITECH LIMITED, UREA MANUFACTURING PLANT v. WORKERS UNION PAK-AMERICAN FERTILIZERS LIMITED 2014 PLC 100
• ABID SAEED MIRZA v. FAYSAL BANK LIMITED 2014 PLC 119
• EMPLOYEES UNION v. UNITED BANK LIMITED 2014 PLC 145
• PAKISTAN WAPDA HYDRO ELECTRIC CENTRAL LABOUR UNION v. REGISTRAR, INDUSTRY-WISE TRADE UNIONS 2014 PLC 148
• BAHRIA FOUNDATION NORTH ISLAMABAD v. Chaudhry ALI RANDHAWA 2014 PLC 220
• HABIB BANK WORKERS\' FRONT OF PAKISTAN v. REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, DIRECTORATE OF LABOUR, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 2014 PLC 229

All National Industrial Relations Commission judgments of 2014 →

lawer from fb area from Upper Dir lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes