Sections 2 (xxix) and 28 \ Workman Bank, who were working at the bank as Appellants II and III, claim the appellant to be a 'laborer' and to participate in the election process of the bank employees. Applications for permission were filed and the direct application of the Registrar Trade Unions before the Workers' Union was rejected and the names of the employees were excluded from the voter list on the basis that the appeals were not labor and the appeal against the order. That the appellant was a branch operational manager and had a job description. The other appellant officers given were Grade III and held the Power of Attorney of the Bank Branch in which they were appointed. Yet another appellant was equivalent to the Branch Operational Manager for the second appellant who was the Branch Operational Manager Officer Grade II. Yes, there was another appellant. A power of attorney and in charge of ATM cards and customer remittances who are responsible for managing cash and time deposits, ppellants, in the current situation, have dropped out of the working class and become members of the Workers Trade Union and collective bargaining. Was not eligible to participate in the agent's proposed election. \ R \ n
Related judgments — National Industrial Relations Commission, 2010
