MUHAMMAD ASHFAQ versus PEARL CONTINENTAL HOTEL, KARACHI THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER
The application of unfair wages by Sections 49 (4) (e) and 63 employers who claimed to be the Deputy Propaganda Secretary of the Workers' Union at the Employer Hotel alleges that it was because of their trade union activities. The victim has They were issued a charge sheet and were ordered to begin the inquiry with the appointment of an employee / administration selection inquiry officer who applied for his dismissal, dismissal, mandatory retirement, transfer or a negative order. While filing a petition before the National. The Industrial Relations Commission had filed a written statement for employers objecting to the legal and factual objection of the applicant in a charge sheet to prevent the administration from performing any act of unfair labor practice. Was issued in which very serious charges were leveled against the applicant. The appointment of the inquiry officer was objected to, they were replaced and the inquiry officer was replaced and the internal inquiry at the administrative level reached a final conclusion and the conclusion was reached till the applicant was fully involved in the said proceedings. Liais parties revolve around facts to claim arbitrary misconduct by the administration; any interference by the commission in the internal investigation process is not legally justified, as the commission assumes jurisdiction. And the internal audit legal framework between the employee and the administration It was illegal to make a decoration decision. Jurisdiction of the Commission on Legal Rights through the Administration
Related judgments — National Industrial Relations Commission, 2010
