Appellant Appellant, who was the officer of Grade III and II respectively of Section 2 (XXX), 25, 26 and 28 Workman, claimed that the nature of his duties was manual and that the learned applicants. An application was made to allow them to participate. The selection process of the Registrar / Authorized Officer of the Union employees and workers dismissed the request briefly and the names of the appellants who were displeased with the registrar's order were dropped, filed before the Commission Chairman / RITU. In order to prevent the election proceedings, the chairman of the commission has issued a notice to the employer bank to resolve the matter so that the list of duties assigned to each appellant should be given to determine that they are `laborers'. Or not. The matter was adjourned and the application for the establishment of the electoral process was rejected. The appeals for the right to declare their status as employees and to participate in their selection were completely rejected, for the legal side, The record of the appeal file was falsified, there will be no further hearing or appeal proceedings but a waste of time and exercise. r \ n
Related judgments — National Industrial Relations Commission, 2010
