OBAIDUR REHMAN versus PEARL CONTINENTAL HOTEL, KARACHI
Sections 49 (4) (e), 46, 63 and 64 of the National Industrial Relations Commission (Procedures and Duties) Regulations, 1973, Regulation 32 (2) (c) allegations of unfair labor by employees who claim to be deputy Thayer, the president of the Workers Union (CBA) at the hotel, was indicted and suspended on various charges, mainly because he had abused the chief telephone operator for being in his hands. Responding unsatisfactory to the charge sheet, threatening to suffer serious consequences, a letter was issued to the applicant asking that the applicant be removed during the period of inquiry. These full occasions were allowed, but the Inquiry Officer allowed the co-worker to assist in the inquiry, the witness was allowed to investigate the complainant and he recorded his statement. And in the fact of the inquiry, his four witnesses, through the petitioner themselves, acknowledged and confessed their testimony to him, were sufficient to resolve, even if the unfair laborer may have acted or committed the petitioner's behalf. Gone In addition, if the charge sheet related to them was the result of abuse under the relevant law, a complaint was filed by a senior administration official after the charge sheet and consequently a request for inquiry was made and consequently The administration took action on both ends. The couple had been comfortable with each other for about 18 years and this was the first time that the applicant had been accused of unfair treatment and the investigation process was delayed in which the applicant was allegedly mismanaged and discriminated against. Accused of behaving
Related judgments — National Industrial Relations Commission, 2010
