Section 2 (xxviii) and 22A (8) (g) Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section 2 (i) National Industrial Relations Commission (Procedures and Functions) Regulations, 1973, Regln 32 Industrial Relations Act (Fourth of 2008), Primable Punjab Industrial Relations Act (XIX of 2010), Applicable Practices for Progress by Employees \ Workman Stay, Section 22A (8) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 (G) ), The applicant's determination in the application, challenged the charge sheet issued to him, alleging that he was an active member of the trade union in the establishment as an active member of his trade union. Due to these reasons, the applicant had also filed an application for interim stay order and the matter was resisted by the employees, this case is related to Punjab where Punjab Industrial Relations Ordinance, 2010 was implemented. Was made and it was stated that there is no provision of the National Industrial Relations Committee in the ordinance. In addition, the Commission did not have the power to decide whether the matter would be dealt with under the provisions of the Industrial Relations Act, 2008, before proceeding with the Punjab Industrial Relations Ordinance, 2010. The employer's jurisdiction to decide on this request was that the applicant was not an employee, but was an officer, his application was not an acceptable record that the applicant was the bank manager of the bank, and the bank had a power of attorney. ? He could not become a member of the union in the establishment or participate in its activities, nor could he be unfairly opposed to his legitimate trade union activities.
Related judgments — National Industrial Relations Commission, 2011
