Sections 25 (8) (g) and 17 National Industrial Relations Commission (Procedures and Functions) Regulations, 1973, Regulation 32 (2) (c) Interim establishment of unfair wages by employees Transferred by employers / employees Challenged the orders on the basis that they were unlawful, discriminatory, void, without legal powers that were subject to the unfair labor practice committed by the National Industrial Relations Commission under Regulation 32 (2) of the 1973 Act. Was given to restrict any act that constituted unfair labor, but such authority was not entrusted to him, if he was found guilty of unfair labor. In the present case, the Commission did not withdraw the applicants / employees, suspending the process of non-transfer orders while preserving the position on which the interim order was granted. The allegations of his position, nor did he join the transfer sites, in the circumstances, the transfer orders were not implemented and it cannot be said that unfair labor practice has already been committed. Applicants failed to specifically mention those who pressured them or cited a specific instance of legal trade union activity that bald allegations of wild and unfair labor practice proved to be excessive. Were not enough to interfere with the commission, as the exact date and time when employers made threats was mentioned. Employers had the priority to use their employees' services in the best possible places and transfer employees, it was created by employers.
Related judgments — National Industrial Relations Commission, 2011
