FACTORY MANAGER/INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS AND ADMINISTRATION,GLAXO SMITHKLINE LTD. PAKISTAN, LAHORE versus MUHAMMAD NASEER KHAN MIRZA
Sections 17, 33 and 47 (5) Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), Section O12 (3) Termination of Job Second Complaint Request, Maintenance of First Request Filed by Employee There was a complaint. The employer, while the other one, was summoned in the previous petition / complaint by the employee under section 33 of the Industrial Relations Act of 2010, as well as the employee's complaint of unfair labor practice. The most recent complaint was that the Labor Court actually had jurisdiction to prosecute and prosecute the grounds laid down in both of these petitions, but not through two separate and independent petitions, both on the basis of unpaid wages and the other. Looking for relief on the matter. Based on individual complaints, which were not simultaneously enforceable, the law prohibited a plethora of claims so that proceedings could be the same. d The dispute of the first request was not enforceable and only the second application could proceed.
Related judgments — Labour Appellant Tribunal Punjab, 2012
