WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH CHAIRMAN WAPDA versus ABDUL REHMAN
The applicant was acting as an Account Assistant in connection with the alleged 46 retirement charges, and after inquiring against him, retired on the charge of embezzlement, the applicant issued a show cause notice After doing this, the deputy manager of the department's employer called for a report detailing the alleged embezzlement allegedly made by the assistant manager to the applicant / employee assistant manager. I was not involved. And the Assistant Manager recommends that employees apologize for the allegations / allegations leveled against them, the inquiry report states, and there is nothing on the record about how much the employees were upset by department officials. It was not enough to allege that the employee had committed huge sums of money, unless it was proved and presented by some evidence, the department had to deal with the confiscation of service. There were no legal rules for The action against the employees could not be initiated under the Ordinance to remove from the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, the appeal filed by the department employer in 2000 was dismissed and the decision approved by the Presiding Officer of the Labor Court was upheld, Under the circumstances
Related judgments — Labour Appellant Tribunal Punjab, 2012
