TALIB HUSSAIN versus SUPERINTENDENT, GOVERNMENT PRINTING PRESS, PUNJAB, LAHORE
Section 33 Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Section OS 15 (3) (e) and 55 Removal from the job due to absence of duty Complaint complaint after issuing the job Having been absent from duty for more than a year and more than ten months after being removed from the job, it was clear from the record of the reason for the notice and investigation against him that the employee was absent from duty. Was the employee required to complete all the actions required by law prior to the imposition of the penalty? He had previously requested that he not be able to attend duty because of his mental distress, in a letter stating that his mother did not go to his own village because of his illness, and That he was absent in caring for his mother, who was seriously ill, because of the absence of the employee, his explanation did not affect his confidence in the duty. Otherwise, he delayed filing a complaint. Failure to explain, no fault or weakness was found in the Labor Court's defective decision, under which they dismissed the appeal.
Related judgments — Labour Appellant Tribunal Punjab, 2012
