CHIEF MANAGER, EMIRATES BANK INTERNATIONAL LTD. versus ABDUL QADIR
The employee was allegedly forced to resign due to a request for a resignation complaint. The employee keeps requesting the employer / bank not to resign. And he may be allowed to continue his service, but the administration prevented him from making false promises that he would consider his request; the employee withdrew his letter before it was accepted by the employee, The employee requested the bank authorities to allow him to join as he had before his acceptance withdrew his resignation. But the bank refused, which forced employees to file a complaint request that was withdrawn before the Labor Court could accept the resignation, followed by a 6/7 day post-resignation order Did not have the legal status to examine and analyze the evidence and came to a valid conclusion, unless the bank was otherwise dealing with the employee, requesting a complaint that the employee filed in 1992, 1998 Was dragged to the bank's attitude. The reputable bank was a respected institution and was expected to show a fair and decent attitude not only with its clients but also with its employees, but in this case the appeal filed by the bank was dropped. Gone, circumstances r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Labour Appellant Tribunal Punjab, 2012