TEXTILE SERVICES THROUGH SENIOR SALES EXECUTIVE versus SYED FAISAL AZIZ
Section 1 (4) (a) and Section O12 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXII of 1969), the Section 25A Service of Service Complaint Petition was objected to by the employer, on the complaint request, it was not enforceable because only 15 persons The Establishment and Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968 was not applicable to the matter when the employee initially assumed that the Standing Order Ordinance 1968 applies to the employer's establishment, to the employee. It takes a lot of load, but it didn't fully apply. Excluded because he failed to make a full list of employees with the Establishment Employee, although he did give some workers names but did not name the full workforce or at least 20 workers, Was a necessity. The law establishment was not being taken under the Standing Order Ordinance, 1968, the complaint filed against the employer was not admissible and the Labor Court H had no jurisdiction to proceed with the same unpaid order approved by the Labor Court. Jurisdiction and lawful authority and was set aside.
Related judgments — Labour Appellant Tribunal Sindh, 2012
