Sections 41 and 55 (3) of the Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), application for a dismissal of section O-15 employment, after the employee is questioned on charge sheet and charges of corruption and neglect against him. Dismissed. The Labor Court allowed the employee to file a complaint against the employee's dismissal order, and neither the complainant's statement was recorded nor the employee / employee's presence mentioned in the employment inquiry process, Nor was its signature obtained on every page of the employee. It was a former inquiry the inquiry officer should have mentioned this fact, but there was no endorsement of the nature provided no reasonable opportunity for the employee to be defended, allegations of misconduct and negligence against the employee, The alleged inquiry was not properly addressed. The problem that hurt the management was not from the employee, as he repeatedly pointed out his mistakes, but no one took it seriously, the management did not consider the employee's opinion. Which, as a result, the employer could not be held responsible for such mismanagement, as he was a worker and subordinate who could not go beyond the letter of suspension at his discretion, show cause notice, order of inquiry, And the dismissal was issued by the presiding officer's disqualification order. The Labor Court, based on the proper definition of evidence, was in accordance with the law, which required no intervention in the appellate tribunal. As previously mentioned the job was also withdrawn
Related judgments — Labour Appellant Tribunal Sindh, 2012
