Find a Lawyer

BUDHAL KHAN versus ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN LTD.

Section 2 (xxx), 46 and 48 Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Section 2 (i) and Section O 15 Employment, Employed Officer Grade III as Employee Officer After filing a dismissal charge sheet and inquiring into the allegations of corruption, a complaint was filed against his dismissal order dismissing the request from the Labor Court that the employee was an employee. In his cross-examination, the employee admitted that as a manager, he had a special duty administrative and administrative staff. Because of his non-employee, his complaint was rightly dismissed by the Labor Court, under the circumstances.

Related judgments — Labour Appellant Tribunal Sindh, 2012

• TEXTILE SERVICES through Senior Sales Executive v. Syed FAISAL AZIZ 2012 PLC 20
• TOP CAN INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. v. IQBAL KHAN 2012 PLC 82
• IBRAHIM KHAN v. SAIF INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LIMITED, KARACHI 2012 PLC 171
• SYNGENTA PAKISTAN LIMITED v. MUHAMMAD QADEER 2012 PLC 175
• ABDUL WAHAB v. ALLIED BANK LIMITED 2012 PLC 281
• ALLIED BANK LIMITED through Attorneys v. SHOUKAT ALI SHAIKH 2012 PLC 309
• AL-KARAM TEXTILE MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED v. SINDH LABOUR COURT NO.IV 2012 PLC 338
• Mst. NOOR JEHAN v. PRESIDING OFFICER, SINDH LABOUR COURT NO.1, KARACHI 2012 PLC 378

All Labour Appellant Tribunal Sindh judgments of 2012 →

solicitors from Kala Bagh lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes