ALLIED BANK LIMITED THROUGH ATTORNEYS versus SHOUKAT ALI SHAIKH
Sections 2 (xxix), 41 and 55 Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Section 2 (i) and Section 0 15 Factors affecting worker's duty Complaint for absence of duty complaints The pay reduction penalty was applied after the employee was charged with chargesheeting and being absent from duty for more than 10 days, after which the basic pay reduction penalty was imposed. The complaint filed by the employee stated that the Labor Court had accepted the sentence. The complaint was objected to by the employer requesting that the employee come. The ytr, auditor employee was not employed, he can not understand another person's job title and the salary of an employee, his commitment to the school could not touch the touch stone. The status of the worker; it was the nature of the duties that could determine his position. In the present case, no employment justification was filed before the Labor Court, and the employee was not questioned about the nature of his job / duties. The record of the employee's status shows that the employee was a laborer and his complaint was filed before the Labor Court, the inquiry against the employee was largely objectionable because he was on duty and The administration had deliberately moved it from one place to another. Elsewhere, and during this period no notice of direct inquiry was presented. Once an employee was in the employ of any establishment, the employer was obliged to provide that notice directly to him. Service, but no such notice is served
Related judgments — Labour Appellant Tribunal Sindh, 2012
