Find a Lawyer

IBRAHIM KHAN versus SAIF INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LIMITED, KARACHI

Article 15 Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Section 1 (4) (c) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance (XCI of 2002), Section 48 (3) of the Granting Authority under the Payment Wages Act Claims for Payment The employee's claim was granted in connection with the payment of gratuity in 1936, but the Labor Court rejected the applicant's claim that there was evidence on record that the Establishment had less than 49 relevant times. Persons employed, under the circumstances, were not entitled to the Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance as required by law for applicability, Nada's case did not apply

Related judgments — Labour Appellant Tribunal Sindh, 2012

• AL-KARAM TEXTILE MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED v. SINDH LABOUR COURT NO.IV 2012 PLC 338
• Mst. NOOR JEHAN v. PRESIDING OFFICER, SINDH LABOUR COURT NO.1, KARACHI 2012 PLC 378
• TEXTILE SERVICES through Senior Sales Executive v. Syed FAISAL AZIZ 2012 PLC 20
• TOP CAN INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. v. IQBAL KHAN 2012 PLC 82
• SYNGENTA PAKISTAN LIMITED v. MUHAMMAD QADEER 2012 PLC 175
• BUDHAL KHAN v. ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN LTD. 2012 PLC 244
• ABDUL WAHAB v. ALLIED BANK LIMITED 2012 PLC 281
• ALLIED BANK LIMITED through Attorneys v. SHOUKAT ALI SHAIKH 2012 PLC 309

All Labour Appellant Tribunal Sindh judgments of 2012 →

property advocates from Alipur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes