Find a Lawyer

SAIFUR REHMAN versus DIVISIONAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEER, WORKSHOPS

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 22A (8) (g) accused of unfair labor practice by employment of employee employee who was an active member of Railway Workers' Union and was elected member of the General. The Council, not only transferred from one establishment to another, but also from one division to another in another city, passed the transfer order, which contained the railways placed in section VKR1 of the Advance Chapter No. 1 of the staff. The policy was explicitly ignored. Employment was a tenure of 10 days against the employee's sanitary and development-related employment law, but his leave was canceled only two days later without any legal validity. The top of the list was and knocked. Below, his further promotion being the most senior, he was exchanged The employee was replaced only with a neutral intention because he would be targeted because of his trade. Such activities could not be allowed to continue in the interest of justice during the activities and holidays were illegally canceled and this was also against the dignity of the Establishment. Was instructed to allow the employee to perform his duties at the posting location from which he was illegally transferred. tax advocates from Jaffarabad lawyer